Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)I
Posts
1
Comments
390
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • But I couldn’t install a specific Python version? System python is 3.13 but I needed 3.10.

    The others have covered virtual environments, which is what you need if you really want a 3.10 interpreter.

    But... the thing I'm here to tell you is:

    they recommend virtual box to not mess with your default installation of the program and the databases it uses.

    for many projects this doesn't actually matter. You can just ignore the warnings, use the most recent version and install whatever you need.

    You're already sandboxing this stuff in a virtual box, which you should be able to reset or bootstrap again when you need to. You're not interfering with your actual systems' python, you're messing with your virtual box's system python.

    I find the whole venv stuff to be very annoying, I never need it, because I use libraries that don't interfere with system operations and I don't downgrade to interact with projects. And even if you're not installing "correct" versions, most of the time newer versions fix bugs and expand functionality. It is extremely rare that functions get removed and it will actually break by you not using their exact version. Or like, version conflicts.

    And besides, they would need some kind of CI / testing that would check for compatibility anyway.

    tldr: ignore venvs, try it bare metal, see if something breaks. If not, there you go, if yes, you can still invest the time and effort of learning venvs.

  • "“Everything in cyberspace is commercial. Everything is in private hands,” he said. De Bruycker, who has led the CCB since its creation a decade ago, stressed that this dependence does not constitute a “major security problem” for the EU. "

    Everyone stop listening to this clown.

  • Eine Zeitung muss keine Quellenangaben zu Dingen angeben, die vor kurzem passiert sind.

    Warum? Was ist denn das für eine Logik? Hast du das einfach beschlossen oder wie funktioniert das?

    Auch was du da verlinkt hast ist nur eine sekundäre Quelle. Das könnte KI generiert oder falsch übersetzt sein, ich kann kein russisch. Die wahre Quelle wäre ein offizielles Video von dieser Rede von einer offiziellen russischen Regierungsseite, ich weiß aber nicht ob es das so gibt. Irgendjemand hat da wohl gefilmt.

    Und wieso bin ich der Arsch wenn ich nach einer ordentliche Quelle Frage, als Kommentar zu einem Artikel zu Desinformation?!?

    I feel like I'm taking crazy pills!

  • Vor kurzem sagte Wladimir Putin vor der russischen Militärführung, es sei "unwahrscheinlich", dass "mit den jetzigen politischen Eliten" in Europa überhaupt eine Lösung möglich ist – nicht nur in Sachen Ukraine. Das werde erst "nach einer Auswechslung der politischen Eliten in Europa" möglich sein.

    Aha. Wann. Wo. Quellenarbeit? Lieber nicht? Aber sich über Desinformation beschweren, genau mein Humor.

    Ich zweifel dabei nicht an das die Darstellung stimmt. Aber das unterscheidende Merkmal zwischen guter Information und Desinformation ist der Nachweis. Wer das nicht liefert, unterstützt eigentlich praktisch Desinformation.

  • Most fact checkers I've seen so far have had pretty poor methodology. Mostly a "here are three people on the internet that confirm my point of view, therefore it is fact and because we drew ourselves as the chad wojack first uh... because this is a fact checking site it's the truth".

  • Dann kann der Mitarbeiter ja einfach irgendwo arbeiten wo es dieses Risiko nicht gibt.

  • What should we do?

    There is no "we" and you can start a fork/rewrite if you want to, good luck!

  • Don't confuse how you think it works, what people say how it works and how it actually works.

    Funnily enough, there is a harry potter fanfic "...and the methods of rationality" that put it very succinctly:

    1. observe that you are confused by a situation
    2. detail what the confusing contradiction is, exactly
    3. observe precisely what is happening and adjust your world view.

    I don’t understand the government coverup.

    In corporate (or democratic) America, everyone is expendable at anytime.

    The coverup protects people, but if everyone is expendable at any time, they would not need to do that.

    If they are doing it anyway, to protect people, that must mean those people aren't expendable.

    If people in corporate or democratic systems are replaceable and these people aren't replaceable, the actual system at work can't be corporate or democratic.


    Put differently, even if Trump is a figurehead and replaceable, the structure behind him ultimately isn't. It's very specific people in very specific positions of power and wealth, who want to increase their power and wealth. Having one of them replaced (forced to give up power or wealth or both), is the opposite of what they want to achieve.

    Also, the whole "coverup" is theater. It's been theater since Epstein died. Everyone already knows, there is no amount of proof that will make people do things now, especially not after ICE is already doing what they are doing, and especially not after the different hints at war and annexation of Greenland, Canada and other issues and the whole military leadership staying silent and signaling at least tolerance if not agreement.

    Having it made public may actually have the opposite effect than is intended and expected of a just society. "Look at the crimes you can get away with if you follow us." "The legal apparatus can't touch us, what makes you think you can do anything."

  • Du denkst die kriegen ohne externe Vorgaben 600 Meinungen unter einen Hut?

  • “If you build it, they will come”

    Du schlägst vor, das jede einzelne der 600+ Krankenkassen in Deutschland einfach mal so mit deinen Beiträgen ins Blaue hinein Software baut und dann "mal guckt was so passiert"? Ist das dein Ernst?

  • Die Kassen können Praxen nicht zur Verwendung der einheitlichen Lösung zwingen. Dürfen sie wahrscheinlich sogar nicht, und noch nicht mal fördern, Ärzte sind bestimmt unabhängig was die Auswahl an bestimmten technischen Geräten angeht.

    Das bräuchte schon ein Gesetz. Trotzdem können die Kassen die Software bauen.

  • Could be very high, even the waste heat from the compression could be used to achieve more compression and turbines get to above 90%, that all depends on the scales they're building this at. 70% overall doesn't seem unrealistic as an educated guess.

  • "Die IHK hat eine sinnvolle Position die ich unterstütze" hatte ich nicht auf meinem 2025 Bingo. Oder dem für 2026.

    "Die zehn Forderungen des DIHK-Positionspapiers

     
            Zollabbau durchsetzen und EU-Einheit stärken
        Rechtssicherheit und transparente Zollverfahren schaffen
        Handelshemmnisse gezielt gemeinsam beseitigen
        Europäische Regulierungshoheit verteidigen
        Technologische Unabhängigkeit aufbauen
        Lieferkettenstandards harmonisieren
        Transatlantische Sicherheitskooperation entwickeln
        Globale Allianzen vorantreiben
        Energie-Partnerschaften krisenfest gestalten
        Deutsche Wirtschaftsbeiträge in den USA sichtbar machen"
    
    
      

    Ist aber nur eine (Nr. 5)

    Ich wüsste nicht wie man "Transatlantische Sicherheitskooperation entwickeln" will ohne mit den USA zusammen zu arbeiten. An wen denken die da? Mexico?

  • Anime and japanese (and chinese?) culture often uses German or French imagery or words in ways that either lack some context and sometimes it's complete gibberish. The "Frieren" anime uses German words for names that would not be names in German. (Frieren is a verb means, "being cold", but actually not the kind of emotionally cold that the character Frieren is either, it just means being physically cold).

    The use of latin is actually deeper rooted in mysticism and religion. Nobody really used it as a spoken language after the fall of the roman empire, but the chatholic church still used it it's ritualistic language until the bible was translated to German by Martin Luther. That's not the only case of that happening either, if you look into the sumerian and related languages, they shared an alphabet, but the actual grammar and pronunciation and use shifted and it evolved in a way that the older language grew to be exclusive for religious rituals, while the more common language was a different one.

    Another example that might have slipped your attention is mathematic's use of Greek symbols. We don't speak Greek. We don't have those symbols readily available on keyboards or anything.

    Programming languages of course. They're basically exclusively in English. Some of the concepts in programming are actually cumbersome to translate and make the most sense if you have an understanding of English.

  • Not sure about "unique"... but it bothers me how bad lots of people are with their documents and tools. In my country we have transparency laws for financing and it's going to say like [xyz department] - 15 million. And I have no idea what that department does. No website, no documents, the projects they do are not public, etc.. How am I supposed to decide if I am happy with what they do?

    And how lenient some institutions are when something that needs to deliver proof of something doesn't actually deliver that proof.

    The assumption of innocence is great when it comes to individual people need to defend themselves against injustice. It's awful for fighting systematic problems that stare you right in the face, but as long as you don't have proof of intention, it's just "oopsie woopsie".

  • The report also notes that journalists "carrying confidential information" or material "personally embarrassing to the Prime Minister on the eve of important treaty negotiations" could face similar scrutiny.

    Weird way to admit that every single politician who could possibly become prime minister has secrets that are so utterly heinous and disgusting, that their revelation would sink important treaty negotiations.

    Just UK things I suppose.

  • If you write something that you base on your previous work, but you don't cite your previous work, that's a problem.

    How is the peer reviewer supposed to know who the author is, I thought obfuscating that was the whole point...

  • Highly recommend it. Although slight warning, you go to 4 new planets with different mechanics, and one is a "hate it or love it" situation. I loved it, but clearly a significant number of people didn't.

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump
  • Sounds good, good luck to the dev!