Thanks! It's quite ironic, that you present your opinions only, but obviously expect people to offer something else, like (scientific?) materials or links to some research results. ¯(ツ)/¯
I'd agree, that it is definitely curious to see the factual comparison of european and N.american safety requirements.
But since it's an exchange of opinions - i guess it's fair it's not only you who is sharing your views)
Ps:
Using LLM is interesting (at least, for me):
the AI tool replies might be the representation of public views. Thus, these are statistically coherent with what most people think /say on certain topic. Or this is my understanding of how this technology works.
And i will certainly trust the report by an AI tool more, than what an unknown user has to offer as an anecdotal evidence.
What you've claimed very much contradicts what I personally have in mind about strict safety requirements in EU. And you do not provide any links to your claims either... ¯(ツ)/¯
Here is an abstract from a reply by Claude 3.7 Sonnet:
European type approval is generally considered more demanding, requiring vehicles to meet requirements before being sold across the EU.
North American certification is more self-certification based, with manufacturers declaring compliance to NHTSA/Transport Canada standards.
Quite intrigued by the drive belt as well, and have been comparing different bikes (both electric and not) to get a new city commuter.
Really want a simple lightweight bike with no greasy chain, no multitude of gears and shifters (nor even disc brakes), but again, afraid the (too nice? novelty?) bike will draw unneeded attention. Which will prevent me from using it without concerns (of being stolen or vandalised)...
A commuter doesn't need a 300€ helmet: safety should be affordable to everyone. Not sure about if "road cyclists" are a special breed, though. 💁Personally, i would never buy any carbon fiber product either (as being overpriced and non-recyclable), there are better alternatives.
Thanks! It's quite ironic, that you present your opinions only, but obviously expect people to offer something else, like (scientific?) materials or links to some research results. ¯(ツ)/¯
I'd agree, that it is definitely curious to see the factual comparison of european and N.american safety requirements. But since it's an exchange of opinions - i guess it's fair it's not only you who is sharing your views)
Ps: Using LLM is interesting (at least, for me): the AI tool replies might be the representation of public views. Thus, these are statistically coherent with what most people think /say on certain topic. Or this is my understanding of how this technology works. And i will certainly trust the report by an AI tool more, than what an unknown user has to offer as an anecdotal evidence.