Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)H
Posts
5
Comments
1249
Joined
3 yr. ago

  • Commenting on other people's food is very common around here. Maybe it's more appropriate to say "don't content negatively on other people's food"? Or better yet, "don't comment negatively on anything unprompted".

  • My work place has to keep sending out emails to remind everyone to not hold the door open for people tailing them.

  • Turns out Benjamin Franklin had it right, and it was this time traveler that caused him to flip it to the wrong direction.

  • no, it doesn't.

    this is stated without any supporting evidence, and can be dismissed without any evidence.

  • What constitutes proof for a moral stance?

  • Not something I want to hear just before going under for my surgery.

  • Getting a business to change is also one of the goals. It pressures restaurants and grocery stores to provide more vegan options and put less focus on animal products.

  • If you have influence, you also have the responsibility to make sure your voice reaches as many people as possible. Screaming this message earlier is a good way of lowering your chances of getting access to a mic at the Grammy at a moment where most people are listening.

  • I think they're referring to random mutations. There's no evolutionary pressure to get better at any of these skills, so at a population level, we're unlikely to see any change. But at the individual level, it's still possible through these mutations.

  • You could open the file manager, enter a URL instead of a local path, and suddenly it's a web browser. I just thought it was a neat trick back then. It's only in retrospect that I realise how dumb it is.

  • Not malicious in the sense that the intent isn't to cause harm to us regular people. If buying those properties raised our prices and didn't help them keep their money, they wouldn't do it. If it didn't raise our prices and helped them keep their money, they would still do it.

  • But does his boss have the authority to allow it?

  • I think what you're seeing is that there are two groups of people interpreting it in two different ways:

    • Change this one thing and everyone will be better off for it.
    • An ideal world would have this feature.
  • You could say the same about people who used the early 2000s Google by entering full questions with natural language and clicking "I'm feeling lucky". There are always going to be wrong ways to use a tool. But we're discussing whether there exists a right way. And that right way includes verifying the information you receive, just like you would if you found it through a regular search engine.

    The social and environmental costs are real. That's not the criticism you gave and not what the responses are disagreeing with.

  • That's how you know it's good

  • Willingness to look is a pretty important factor. LLMs reduce the personal cost incurred to look up information, similar to how search engines saved us from having to go to the library for every question we had.

  • We already had subreddit simulator for ages. This isn't anything new.

  • Cloud housing when?

  • If they run again in the next cycle, it won't be a third consecutive term.