• 9 Posts
  • 107 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 14th, 2023

help-circle

  • It’s Russias way to keep the soviet legacy intact and justify it’s war of aggression to “denazify” Ukraine. There is a huge cultural shift of breaking off any remnants of Soviet “glory” in the country. Sadly it’s hidden behind a lot of valid points, that would explain the abstain votes.

    1. Expresses deep concern about increased frequency of attempts and activities intended to desecrate or demolish monuments erected in remembrance of those who fought against Nazism during the Second World War, as well as to unlawfully exhume or remove the remains of such persons, and in this regard urges States to fully comply with their relevant obligations, inter alia, under article 34 of Additional Protocol I to the Geneva Conventions of 194

    1. Expresses deep concern about increased frequency of attempts and activities intended to desecrate or demolish monuments erected in remembrance of those who fought against Nazism during the Second World War, as well as to unlawfully exhume or remove the remains of such persons, and in this regard urges States to fully comply with their relevant obligations, inter alia, under article 34 of Additional Protocol I to the Geneva Conventions of 194

    Clearly designed to enforce Russian rethoric and force the glorification of USSR. Not surprised it’s voted against by Ukraine.


  • Interesting, although most info about cluster munitions I’ve read were tube artillery (the leaving convention part). Since tube artillery has little in path correction. (There are a few, but most of it is not)

    The countries will have to purchase or produce the ammunition, because they don’t have it stocked. Though.

    Just to be clear:

    I completely agree that fragmentation-based ammunition is much safer for everyone involved.

    I can also agree how it might have some additional Effectiveness in offenisveness, just because your not mining your path forward at the same time.

    I also agree that such artillery might have little use against combined-arms based combat USA uses.

    But I’m yet to see proof, that it beats air released cluster munitions, when trenches or foxholes are involved. A.K.A. The Great War style warfare. (Which Russia seems to be oriented with)

    Also with current transparent battlefield, any artillery and single-use drones reign supreme. So with the new META changes it does feel that we’re arguing about nothing substantial at this point.


  • Anti personnel mines are used together with anti armor mines. They provide the crucial element of slowing de-mining by not allowing infantry (mobiks) doing that by hand. Used alone you could argue, that they are not so effective, but that works for any weaponry.

    My argument is use whatever weaponry is effective. Even if it is old technology. Would be stupid otherwise.

    Also arguing for rocket artillery to replace casual artillery is… Strange. Rocket artillery is expensive and it’s ammo is used up very quickly. I doubt any country can allow itself avoid regular artillery.


  • Cluster munitions and anti-personel mines are effective AF, seeing how the Ukrainian-Russian war is progressing.

    The countries in question will create additional factories just for these bad boys. The old stock if any is pretty much useless.

    These things are dangerous for civilians, but far less than an aggressive nation by your doorstep. Notice how all the countries border Russia?

    It is useless if you have air superiority, but only US has that, and no one believes they’ll honor article 5.