Both have a lot of stuff named after them, no? At least in the cities I’ve been to, there’s always something named after at least one of them, if not a park then a street or a monument.

Preparing for the future? What’s the opposite of nominative determinism?

Well that deescalated quickly

Everyone knows large-dollar donors always have more popular opinions, and they’re always right, anyway. Otherwise where would they get all those large dollars?

Is this loss

MS software also doesn’t play nice with virtual desktops. Opening excel files or answering teams calls yanks you all over your workflow.

Alas, working an Excel job in a non-tech field, I fear I will suffer Windows the rest of my working life ☠️

Bite my shiny metal ass

The best and brightest of Long Island and New Jersey.

Me in Halo 3

For clarification, the Women’s Grandmaster and International titles are conferred after a certain level of achievement overall in one’s career. There is no limit to the number of people who can have those titles. I feel like if you use a phrase like “world title holder” there’s an implication that such a world title is like “champion of whatever” and is only held by one person at a time (like a “World Champion(ship title)”).

Each of their speeds is constant, but different, and they’re walking in different directions.

What’s a country with 0?

why is there a salami in his gameboy

Would be pretty funny if they don’t donate and he starts backing green policies out of spite.