

Yeah I was thinking of this as a half measure. But less secure than just wiping
Class: He/him/they.
Alignment: Hopeful loser.
Aesthetic: WIP, horror vacui / amor copia.
🚧🚧🚧🚧🚧🚧🚧🚧🚧🚧🚧
🚧 UNDER CONSTRUCTION🚧
🚧🚧🚧🚧🚧🚧🚧🚧🚧🚧🚧


Yeah I was thinking of this as a half measure. But less secure than just wiping


Or maybe a lighter version of the duress pin that just loads the fake profile (or alternate profile) but leaves the other(s) intact.
If you’re just handing your phone over for a border pig to swipe through before waving you through that might be adequate.


That’s what accommodations are for


Yeah I did this with C and it was stressful, but the marks are usually graded more leniently if its clear you just got a function name mixed up for example.
“Open book” or internet tests or tests you wrote at home were much harder because they know you have all the resources


Yeah, it’s pretty evocative. Kind of can’t stop staring at it.


Oh my God, Analog is so good right now. I just finished reading the “January/February 2026” issue and it’s full of such great stories! Some real emotions and intrigue. Totally blown away.
I’ve prepaid for a 2 year subscription, I’m all in.
Welcome, to City 17. It’s safer here.
The rule is for vibe coded projects. From the article:
If your work fits into these cases, it is unlikely that you are affected at all:
- Projects who have an active community that cares about and maintains the software
- Projects with a significant pre-LLM history
- Maintainers who unknowingly or willingly accepted LLM-generated contributions from other contributors, if your project otherwise does not involve the heavy use of LLMs
They don’t need a rule that can be run automatically because it’s a purely human operation that is trying to take a stand against the more pernicious effects of corporate LLMs.
Do you just disagree with this stance and are just trying to poke whatever hypothetical holes you can in their logic, or do you just want more rigorous definitions/rules?
From experience, content moderation works best when there is some flexibility in the rules, so people can talk it out and come to concessions together.


Every house party rofl
I use LibreWolf on desktop and IronFox on mobile (android, grapheneOS), and I’ve got 0 complaints.
Let the people play out their fantasies of justice, equity, and revolution in a totally contained, purely virtual way.

“Greetings fellow Nazis!” Yeah fuck these guys
Like anyone who’s offended by this isn’t already slopping for Microsoft’s GitHub.
I use them as one of my mirrors for public projects, but host my own repos and CI now.
As in obvious. Like they have model instructions and bots credited as authors on commits.
What about for more squishy arguments that are entirely about emotions and feelings etc? I remember getting tilted by reading “my culture is not a costume” on a zine, and the emotional appeal is what got me to change my tune
Daily.
Whenever’s there’s a disagreement I’ll at least entertain that I might be wrong.
Being wrong and not knowing it feels exactly like being right. You wouldn’t know.
Nevermind situations that are more about perspectives than actually binary right/wrong.


Sounds like you’re just making your own albums


I have grown up to become that person that gets tilted by shuffle buttons (real)
Disgusting