Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)G
Posts
0
Comments
144
Joined
3 yr. ago

  • I remember reading (relatively recently) research showing conservatives literally believe badvthingscdo not happen to good people. If they know someone personally who they know is good, and something bad happens to them, they either think it is a rare example of bad luck and they will help out, or they will decide that person must not have been a good person.

    It allows them to justify the mental gymnastics of being anti-abortion but paying for their daughter's "procedure" at the same time. A "good" family member who gets cancer deserves help, but why should they fund cancer care for those morally bankrupt <fill in the "other"> people?

    Apparently they have overactive amygdalas, among other issues, and a reduced ability to engage critical thinking towards their own beliefs.

    So, yes, they kind of are cult members. But they can't be easily deprogrammed, and even if we purged this lot, we would still end up with some cropping up again.

  • We did do some of our training in New Brunswick

  • I wonder if his handlers have a pool going for who can get him to say the most deranged thing.

  • Usually guided by McKinsey, Bain, or BCG.

  • When you rent something, you can share it. You rent a car, you can have passengers. You rent an apartment, you can have visitors. You rent a tool, you can lend it to your neighbour.

  • Canadian Law Enforcement Officer internet?

  • I think the "to randomly stop people" is for decoration. They're actually describing the authoritarian personality disorder that makes someone want to be a cop. "The police need power" is the essence. And I say, fuck that! The police need boundaries, better judgement, and a shock or two to the system because I agree with another commenter, ACAB.

  • Keeping track of the conservatives will make it easy to identify the collaborators when the US invades. Then we can use them for disinformation and honeypots while we work our way through the enemy.

  • Why wouldn't you order them for your wife? Does already have some?

  • offer a better, fully fleshed out alternative

    is a bit of straw man. Offering a rough list of alternatives for discussion would be sufficient response to the question.

    you are allowed to say X is shitty on its own

    while true, this ignores that your original statement was challenging this choice over other possibilities. So yes, you can just say it's a shitty choice, but you (colloquially, at least) implied there exist better choices in your opinion. So it is reasonable to ask what those might be.

  • Whatever it is, it certainly seems to make conservative politicians get on their knees.

  • Kinda depends on the role. I mean, I am a GRC, privacy, and security specialist who is usually brought in to teach existing employees how to improve their security awareness, and I have been a consultant in the IT industry for over 25 years. So I usually come in not trusting the employer.

  • Looks to me like they will kill you on the spot whether you defend yourself or not. If I were an American nowadays, I would be expecting that eventuality. It is about time the non fascist side recognizes the civil war you're already in.

  • raises hand - even the retired ones are still decent. And prepared.

  • If your corporation is running windows 11, you can't be trusted to keep things malware free. If you're a corporation, you should also respect true capitalist behaviour, and if they can make a profit offshoring, what difference does it make. If, however, you provide robust, *nix based equipment, follow a disciplined SDLC, and are not a corporation, then I might a couple of highly disciplined, experienced systems analysts with a GRC and privacy focus who would love to learn more about you.

    Although you do open with the fact you don't trust your people, so, probably not.

  • Since ICE is known to murder American citizens, if you see ICE and you are an American citizen, it would be reasonable to fear for your life. Would it then not be required to use all reasonable means to protect yourself from the imminent threat of death? Don't you Americans have some kind of self-defense laws about that?

  • What would be the optimal prompt for that, I wonder? And where should people send the output?

  • Instead of fining giant corporations, punish them by requiring them to provide a fixed percentage (not dollar amount) of voting shares to the judging government per violation. Too many violations and the corporation ends up a wholly owned subsidiary of whatever nations punish them. Shareholders will fight to make sure the corporations are compliant. Or, we end up with nationalized corporations, reduced shareholder capitalism, and fewer oligarchs.

  • HVAC specialists and cooling systems experts will probably be in high demand to keep the future AI overlord datafarms frpm overheating. They'll become the new priest class lol