for fucking what?

literally everything this man does can be explained by the brain worm

im not sure about ubuntu based distros. without selinux, you may not need the extra option on the volume mount.

when I moved my docker setup to a fedora coreos podman setup, the volume mounts required an additional option for a label to play nice with selinux. ‘z’ if the mount is shared between multiple containers and ‘Z’ if its just for one container.

the podman docs definitely go into more details.

ive also seen people talk on the discord about scripts that can take your yaml files and write container files to be used with podman-systemd that seemed pretty nice. i think there is also a podman-compose option out there, but I’m not super familiar with that.

ayo, I think I won the privacy bingo! thats what this is right?

if you can boot a live iso, its probably not hardware. if you can’t boot a live iso, it might be hardware.

people know who Taylor Swift is tho

bro, is it you? are you that streamer?

its in the ubuntu or debian toolbox. distrobox is pretty freaking awesome.

what is it?

hell yeah! ublue has been fantastic.

probably lost him at “realize”

what a trashy person.

This is pretty much explains why I’ve been digging bluefin lately.

I do not think blockchain would solve any funding issues. Its more so about the information and it’s validity in a decentralized network. I realize blockchain is almost exclusively associated with cryptocoins, but it seems like there should be other use cases for the technology. It would be cool to have a centralized ledger of CVEs where the information is agreed upon by partners; be it various vendors, governments, and institutions.

I am definitely not a blockchain expert, or even a novice. I’m probably closer to the people that don’t know how the regular web works. With the rise of de-centralized/federated social media an communications, I’d think people would be interested in a similar framework for something like the CVE database. I’m not say blockchain is the answer for this issue either, it was just an idea. An idea that people are not big fans of apparently, and that’s fine. I think a different commenter mentioned using git, so there’s another idea.

Regardless of the method, I see de-centralization as a benefit and hopefully other do as well.

oh no.

You asked me “Do you think they won’t need funding on the blockchain?” No, I don’t think that.

I do think they need funding.

what, that I do not think that?

what are you trying to argue?

That works too, but who controls the servers, and how is the authority handled? Backing up the data is one thing, and that can be easily done I believe. But what about for future advisories? They are published via one of the authoritative servers and synced to the other authoritative servers? How is that information verified to ensure bad actors aren’t publishing bullshit information?

I don’t think blockchain is necessarily the answer. The whole thing can just be done with signing keys, yeah?

I know everyone hates on blockchain, but I think its kinda neat and would like to see some cool applications with it one day.

No

can they put cve on a blockchain? or some publicly auditable distributed database?

its worrisome that all it takes is a funding cut to shut it down.