Every, single, spinoff of Top Gear, which by definition didn’t have the trio, failed. I mean they tried three times in the US, and all three failed. They tried one in every English-speaking country, and some non-English-speaking ones. They all failed.
Then the trio went to Amazon because the BBC wouldn’t accommodate the big buffoon’s ego and stupid shenanigans, and even there it took them a couple of years and several major changes to the format of the show for things to click, which still wasn’t as good as Top Gear.
Amazon couldn’t even find three car guys!? One of them is a “trainspotter”?
This’ll fail too, spectacularly.
Note that in the US, the title of the patent can say pretty much anything it wants and be the most obvious or broad thing. What actually matters is the list of claims. That’s what one needs to read and that’s what the actual patent outlines.
This particular patent has 13 claims which narrow down and define what the supposed inventions is.