Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)G

gaterush

@ gaterush @lemmy.world

Posts
0
Comments
18
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • Stuff...

    Jump

  • I think the 170 weight on the right is larger than the 170 weight on the left... That's all I can look at

  • jam

    Jump

  • Another productive meeting

    Jump

  • A bonus is you can invite your dental hygienist over and have your teeth cleaned while you work

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump

  • I thought those were blobs of nacho cheese

  • Not sure 🤔

    Jump

  • Is IsSlackDown down? This link isn't working for me for some reason lol

  • Just Some Moss (More Pictures in Comments)

    Jump

  • I was promised more moss

  • Is there a community where I can get news about technology as in science, as opposed to "drama involving tech companies"?

    Jump

  • Hacker news still going strong, you get the drama stories here and there but the focus is on the technology

  • The anatomy of a Largemouth Bass

    Jump

  • And B must be for Body of course

  • You want some water?

    Jump

  • The water cooling system that only needs to be used once

  • Bing says Alpha Centauri is 13.6 kilometers from us

    Jump

  • I just tried and got "about 40,000 billion kilometers". Also the references are completely different from the ones in the post, so I guess it was a ranking issue

    AI is just too unpredictable, hard to know what's accurate and you end up doing the work yourself anyways

  • Touch a file in Linux

    Jump

  • that's awesome, did not know about that handy operator!

  • Touch a file in Linux

    Jump

  • The other command could just be printf '' >> file to not overwrite it. Or even simpler >>file and then interrupt

  • Can't bear to review one more PR today

    Jump

  • I generally agree and like this strategy, but to add to the other comment about catching reimplemented code, there's just some code quality reviewing that cannot be done by automating tooling right now.

    Some scenarios come to mind:

    • code is written in a brittle fashion, especially with external data, where it's difficult to unit test every type of input; generally you might catch improper assumptions about the data in the code
    • code reimplements a more battle tested functionality, or uses a library no longer maintained or is possibly unreliable
    • code that the test coverage unintentionally misses due to code being located outside of the test path
    • poor abstractions, shallow interfaces

    It's hard to catch these without understanding context, so I agree a code review meets are helpful and establishing domain owners. But I think you still need PR reviews to document these potential problems

  • I code with fear

    Jump

  • When your function literally returns the void

  • onlick

    Jump

  • I don't want to think of what the FaceTime integration would be like...

  • Denmark’s Crown Princess Mary to become first Australian-born Queen

    Jump

  • It's 2024 and we're still doing king and queen stuff apparently

  • Amazon Prime Video will start showing ads on January 29th unless you pay extra for ad-free

    Jump

  • I don't have prime any longer and I don't miss it, it's overrated really. I don't need stuff within 2 days all the time