you could argue semantically
No. There's nothing to argue there, it's the definition of OCR.
Also, do you believe that LLMs found a new, novel way of doing OCR? That's not how they work, LLMs don't invent, they don't innovate, they're simply unable to do that. What they do, when they work correctly, is that they use already known and established techniques and tools. So to quote your top comment in this chain:
Skill issue
It's not as clear cut as this, a lot of the studies that suggest this don't stand up to scrutiny, with for example some having numbers of estimated birds killed by cats over the total estimated bird population. Also the fact that the majority of kills by cats are already weak or sick animals, animals that would die soon either way, and not really affect the total population. The only ones that seem legit and suggest an effect on the population are from small islands.