Writing "the 50th vote" instead of "another vote" or even "a 50th vote" implies that specific vote is more important, like reaching a threshold. At least that's how I see it.
I hate the political compass. r/PCM did a lot in normalizing the far right and recruiting for them. And it's not even close to accurate (Hitler shows up as barely to the right ffs).
Nah I'm good, was able to find it on my own. The thing it misses is that what people call "AI" isn't deterministic, since it has no sense of actual meaning (it is, after all, just an evolution of your phone keyboard's word prediction, just with an enormous amount of both data and compute). So it could pass an exam one time, then fail it right after even if the conditions don't change. It hallucinates. A lot. So your idea of an "AI knowledge base" is flawed by design.
"using reason and math" and yet you disagree with the scientific consensus that climate change is man made ("only half" is disagreeing) because of a feeling.
Also what's the threshold to "be a problem"? 1.5%? Why?
That would leave only 8 (maybe 10, depending on the source) countries that "matter", with a total of 67-69% of the world's emissions. So more than 30% of the world's emissions are not a problem?
You're reaching a lot in your "theory" trying to attribute logic (however few of it) to the ramblings of a delusional, unintelligent and dementia riddled old man. I do not believe for a second that there's any logic other than "big number make me feel good".
And the deception part would require him to understand and accept that he was wrong, which he's shown to be completely unable to do numerous times.
I see "eat the rich" as "use them as fertilizer".