https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Not_invented_here

Why does fediverse news exist anyway when there’s like 5 fediverse comms that serve the same purpose. Some real NIH.

deleted by creator

Lossless encoding, by definition, won’t have any quality loss.

The posting of webps will continue until support improves.

This depends, if your image contains a lot of flat colours (like a screenshot of a website) then PNG can actually give you smaller file sizes than lossless webp. But for most images (especially ones with compression artefacts) lossless webp gives smaller sizes.

It was a screenshot from the Indiana Jones game of Indy petting a cat saying “You don’t care much for these fascists, do you?” They captioned the screenshot with “good kitty”.

Paedophiles.

To be clear, this post is satire. Bad satire, but satire nontheless. https://feddit.uk/post/35692308

Right now blacksky.community is an app that uses Bluesky’s AppView, which in turn uses Bluesky’s Relay. They’re working on their own AppView (which will have the equivalent of local-only posts) and that will use their Relay.

Interesting, from what I understand of ATProto, this would be hard to do on protocol, it’ll be fascinating to see how they do it. Maybe something off protocol like the recent bookmark feature Bluesky got.

I didn’t mean to undercut your point though, they often talk about PDSs as analogous to web pages, so your “different search engines” analogy is very accurate, it’s just not quite there yet.

I’d love to take credit for this, but the ATProto docs themselves make this comparison which is where I’m getting this from.

if I recall correctly either in (((streams))) or Forte (or maybe both) MIke implemented the nomadic identity over ActivityPub as well

This sent me down a bit a of a rabbit hole. It seems (streams) used an updated version of Zot, Zot/11 but was renamed to just Nomad. I can’t find anything about this, the (streams) repo only contains the spec for Zot/6, so I’m not sure about it’s APub compatibility. Apparently, Nomad had been discontinued in Forte in favour of pure APub, anyway.

If you’re thinking about this kind of stuff for Lemmy, it’s also worth looking at https://socialhub.activitypub.rocks/t/fep-ef61-portable-objects/3738

Oh, I know about Silverpill’s work, it’s really interesting! I even mentioned it recently. I’m glad we have someone smart like them working on this stuff.

I do think some kind of separation of user data from servers, like what AT Proto does, is actually quite desirable. I just don’t like that PDSes can have their data harvested by whoever, I think data sharing with a server should be opt-in.

It’s from !conservative2@lemmy.today (which seems to have been deleted or removed?). I don’t get why the move to a new comm when they already control !conservative@lemmy.today.

Or for the new crosspost display to be collpased by default.

That’s what Photon and Thunder do and imo, it works pretty well. Especially for posts with like a 10 crossposts, example.

Oh, I thought blacksky.comnunity used Blacksky’s relay. If it uses Bluesky’s then yeah, disregard what I said.

That’s not a perfect analogy though because Blacksky makes different moderation decisions than Bluesky.

I’d hope so given how abysmal Bluesky’s moderation is. The discovery feed is filled with transphobia, but you can’t say Charlie Kirk should rest in piss.

Again though it’s not a perfect analogy because the AT Protocol architecture lets you migrate all your data between PDSs seamlessly, and so far only a few niche ActivityPub implementations support that (Hubzilla et al with nomadic identity, ActivityPods using Solid Pods).

I don’t believe Hubzilla’s nomatic identity works with APub though, irrc it uses something called Zot.

I’ve been thinking about how to add nomatic identity to Lemmy quite a bit and it’s something I’d like to work on after 1.0 is out, but it’s hard a problem for sure.

I can see that, I just hate the added friction. I’d rather the boost button stay as it is and quote be put into the meatball menu.

It’s an action that needs confirmation anyway. :)

This is a setting on your account, under ‘Appearance’. I have it off.

A better analogy would probably saying it’s like Bing/Google. They’re independent of each other but broadly what’s on one is on the other.

If an author of a post has enabled quoting, you’ll see an option to quote their post under a new menu accessed from the Boost button.

Oh no, I hate this kind of interface. If I a click a button, it should do something, not open a menu.

independent but still connected (think about Lemmy instances)

It’s not really connected in the same sense two Lemmy instances are connected. They’re able to pull in the same data as Bluesky as it’s all public and PDSs don’t really have the ability to block a relay from crawling them.

The discourse around decentralisation has elevated a form of network architecture that facilitates and contributes to a healthier social internet into a goal into itself.

Big agree with this.

That doesn’t feel like how search should work. It should be ranking results that fit the search query better higher than ones that fit it less.

But the existing filters already prescribe an order outside of how closely the search term matches, you brought up top month and I don’t see how you’d want that to work other than a binary filter sorted by votes.

What you’re describing would be a new sort order, analogous to Reddit’s ‘Relevance’ sort. It’s certainly doable with postgres’ builtin distancing operators, though it be slower.

It’s probably playing off the toppling of the govt in Bangladesh that I’ve seen called the ‘Gen-Z Revolution’.