That's more interesting an answer than I was expecting! I didn't even consider that any floppy disk Mavicas could be modern enough to have USB. The only time I used one of these, you could still assume a floppy drive in every computer.
I think you should be able to do whatever you want, maybe by changing a setting or placing a convenient symlink to a more obscure directory or whatever.
But I also think the way desktop functionality has been implemented in various operating systems has prevented a whole lot of people from learning how to use a hierarchical filesystem.
It's a user-education issue, and a lot of PC users still have no concept of storing files anywhere else but their desktop.
If you have to have a toolbar, at least make it go away when you scroll.
This is one of my least favorite modern trends — UI shouldn't go away.
First, even if you're not actively using the bar, if it contains access to a menu, buttons or title/context of any kind, it should remain glanceable. If you're going to tap it, you first need to see it, and having to unhide it adds extra effort to every interaction. What's more, less experienced users may not even remember that the hidden functionality exists. And if I'm scrolling a feed of some kind, in an application with multiple feeds, being able to instantly glance at where I am is useful.
But also, the idea that scrolling the content down a little to make the UI appear makes no sense. I have the content scrolled to where I want it, and scrolling it a little in a particular direction to make more features show up is absurd. The content and UI have nothing to do with each other.
You shouldn't be able to save documents, or files of any kind, to your desktop. It should be a special place that allows application launchers and shortcuts to files, but not as an easy-to-find regular folder.
Hamburger menus are fine if the developer has the restraint to truly limit the number of items, but it can quickly become an unsorted "junk drawer." And you sometimes still end up with submenus anyway!
I think that's actually a popular opinion. I'd have to disagree, though! The amount of title I'm able to see on a tab, and the amount of space I have to interact with it, shouldn't be dependent on how many other tabs I have open.
The way I see it, double-clicks are optional — if you already know what you want to do, they're a quick way to do the default interaction. The "real" way to interact with such an element is to single-click to select it, and then further interact with it via menus, which reveal everything you can do with it, including opening it. Right-click context menus are also optional, providing a subset of functionality pulled from the full menus.
Except no one is ever taught that, and Windows 95's desktop made sure of it.
That's important context. Every chapter of Little Brother was dedicated to a different bookstore, which is a little different than "Hey Amazon, btw I love you."