If it’s open source, you could perhaps tinker with the algorithm. My main desires for rss feeds are:
Any clue if nunti could do that?
For ultimate effect, let’s figure out how to turn the ground under solar panels into peatlands.
The main problem with mowers is that they can’t get around equipment very well, so there ends up being labor intensive trimming that needs to be done
All the concern about this dye is based on a 1990 study where they fed rats 0.5%, 1%, or 4% of their diet by mass with the dye. Only the group with 4% of their diet had an effect on thyroid stimulating hormone, and follow on effects on t3 and t4. This increased stimulation of the thyroid is what they hypothesized is responsible for potential tumor growth. That dose is ~5,000-15,000 times higher than a regular diet. Increasing sugar or alcohol or literally anything else in your diet by that amount will have dire consequences.
Furthermore, the authors mention that a 100x dose human trial had increased TSH, but without changes to t3 or t4. This (and other factors they bring up in the paper) show that humans don’t respond like rats, so these rat studies can’t really be applied to humans. Even a massive overdose wouldn’t have the same potential for causing cancer in human as it does in rats.
All that said, there’s no benefits to the consumer to have food that’s just more red. Banning red 3 isn’t going to make manufacturers stop dyeing food red, it’s going to make them switch dyes, which might not be able net positive.
The FDA’s notice even says this:
two studies that showed cancer in laboratory male rats exposed to high levels of FD&C Red No. 3 due to a rat specific hormonal mechanism. The way that FD&C Red No. 3 causes cancer in male rats does not occur in humans. Relevant exposure levels to FD&C Red No. 3 for humans are typically much lower than those that cause the effects shown in male rats. Studies in other animals and in humans did not show these effects; claims that the use of FD&C Red No. 3 in food and in ingested drugs puts people at risk are not supported by the available scientific information.
They mention that they are forced to ban it due to a technicality of the law:
The Delaney Clause, enacted in 1960 as part of the Color Additives Amendment to the FD&C Act, prohibits FDA authorization of a food additive or color additive if it has been found to induce cancer in humans or animals.
So even if we know for sure that a substance is fine for humans, if there’s any animal that could be given cancer by ingestion of any dose, it legally should be banned.
For example, if you did a study where you fed dogs chocolate for a year, and they developed liver cancer due to the constant poisoning, you could petition to have chocolate banned as a food edditive.
The most crucial part of the process is that you and i will be the ones paying for the energy used for carbon capture, but the fossil fuel companies will be the ones profiting from selling the energy.
As someone with only a casual interest in 3d printing, are the open source 3d printers worth the effort it takes to make them vs buying one?
If I recall correctly (i.e., I’m talking out my ass), when people have late fees that continue to stack up, some percentage of people will decide to just stop using the library. This results in them keeping the books, and also removes them as customers. This ultimately costs the library more than they gain by having fees.
Also, there’s the saying “a fine is a price”. The idea is that by having a late fee, people are okay paying the late fee. Shame is often stronger than modest fees.
You just have to slowly start printing all the pieces for your own Von Neumann probe printer
Oftentimes, yes. Mine has a series of little rooms. They are often used by teens working on homework together.
Ah, so it’s just pinching a little bit of the bag or something?
I often just put a baking dish or something on top. I think the main thing is making sure to get as much air out as possible, which may be also necessary midway through cooking. I have some fermentation weights, though, that I think would really do the trick well.
Do you have magnets that you know are food safe?
It turns out, to make really durable glass and ceramic, you are really just bottling up their inherent rage. I mean, it’s even called “tempered glass”.
I do it the same way as a pizza. Preheat pan on the stove, bake in the oven until it looks good on top, then finish on the stove till I’m happy with the browning on the bottom.
Those differences are due to heat absorption. Ovens mainly heat by convection, but there’s also radiation. Light colored pans reflect heat from radiation while dark pans absorb it. Since these pans are roughly the same color on the outside, it shouldn’t make much of a difference on the inside.
In addition to what others said about the availability of the source code itself, there’s a whole legal framework around it.
A company could have code where the source is publicly available, but they still could say that you are not allowed to copy, fork, sell/distribute it. In that case, there wouldn’t physically be anything preventing you from doing it, which sounds strange, until you think about how that’s the exactly how it works for books, music, movies, etc.
There’s also an in-between for software that’s not publicly open source, but is open source to users. A company could sell you their software, and deliver it to you as open source code.
That must be a language thing, cause I would call any pepper that’s not spicy a bell pepper. Whoever wrote the Wikipedia article on bell peppers said
bell pepper is the only member of the genus Capsicum, that does not produce capsaicin
So if it’s not spicy, it’s a bell pepper (at least where I live), but they can be in different forms. Not that any of that matters.
https://www.kroger.com/product/images/large/front/0005783600062
Idk, looks similar enough to me. OP has tasted them, and would have probably noticed if they were spicy.
https://www.goral-shoes.co.uk/products/the-smugs-horween-natural-pre-order
Certainly out of my price range, lol. To make a long story short, though, sneakers (and all other athletic foam-based shoes) are inherently not durable, nor designed to be. To get long life out of footwear, you really need to wear more traditionally constructed (i.e., no foam) shoes or boots for 95% of the time, and save athletic footwear for when it’s needed. You don’t even really need foamy shoes for all athletics.
I’m lucky if I can get 700 km out of a standard pair of running shoes, but foamless (or foam-lite) “barefoot” shoes like xeroshoes have a 5000 mile warranty.
Oh wow, they really did a good job of explaining it. It’s not too complex. I think it probably would be able to filter out some of the fluff.