Also gonna hit him on the semantic part here because why not but I remember seeing a documentary a long time ago about a rural village in an impoverished nation where girls were constantly developing incontinence issues and other long-term injuries because they were often giving birth at 14-15 and some anglo documentarian was saying how even waiting until they were 16 would have greatly reduced these rates because their bodies were too small and undeveloped (
). So no Peter, 14-17 is not fucking "developed sexually"
I mean, we could just say that (IIRC the group names) pedophiles, hebephiles, and ephebophiles all deserve the same punishment for their crime? At a certain point we're just arguing semantics. Just don't fuck someone unless they're a consenting coherent adult. Call it what you will, the result can just be the same:
Comments like this make me wish I could upbear more than once to elevate your response higher than my comment comrade, because you hit the nail right on the head far better than I could.
The constant influx of western capitalist media hyperbole is probably at least partially responsible for the extraordinary rate of anxiety disorders in western society, which I'm sure suits the capital-owning classes just fine, the only resolution being to be medicated to the levels of tranquility seen in a dairy cow before its slaughter.
Not even that, how good you are at taking a standardised test on a given day. We also know people who are traumatised by poverty or individual adverse life events have lower success rates on these tests, making them even more useless at best and vicious at worst.
10 trillion dollar investments coming, entire stock market now relies on this to exist.