• 13 Posts
  • 6.72K Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: July 18th, 2023

help-circle
  • i suspect that spanish has japanese beat in this regard because of its relatively larger geographical dissemination makes formality based grammar rules incompatible with each other – effectively making all incompatible versions technically correct despite literally contradicting each other.

    it’s one of the reasons why a majority of non-spanish speakers are taught european spanish rather than any of the SIGNIFICANTLY larger versions of spanish that exist.


  • eldavi@lemmy.mltoPrivacy@lemmy.mlMY PRIVACY GARDEN - CODEBERG
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    22 minutes ago

    in the interest of reciprocity from someone who was once “terminally online”: educate yourself on the tribalism of the lemmyverse:

    lemmy was created by leftists who had a strong interest on gnu/foss technologies; but the recent reddit user purges has swelled the number of lemmy users. the new users are almost entirely liberal and the trolls among them have turned this instance into a hotbed of political tribalism enough that many leftists have chosen to re-home their memberships to hexbear.net or lemmygrad.ml instances. likewise, the most ardent liberals have created piefed to avoid exposure to leftist political theory.

    the people of this and most of the gnu/foss communities on this instance seem to do their best to stay politically neutral, as the lemmy developers try to do as well.






  • eldavi@lemmy.mltoMemes@lemmy.mlUSA elections be like
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 hours ago

    i’m convinced that it’s because people considered it in theory only; disconnected from the real human preventable tragedy that it is.

    now social media is making it difficult to ignore the impact of this human tragedy and it’s forcing people to add their humanity to that theoretical consideration.

    i’m also convinced that the age/id verification systems that all western gov’ts are currently implementing are geared towards returning us to a state of giving greater emphasis on theory rather than humanity.



  • eldavi@lemmy.mltoMemes@lemmy.mlUSA elections be like
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 hours ago

    The opinion makes sense to deontologists, but to the teleologists of the world it rightfully seems insane.

    from a deontologist’s view, refusing to play along with a system that enables genocide is the only moral move. you don’t need it to be effective. you need to not be complicit. that’s the intention and goal that you seem to be miss understanding.

    teleologists call that insane because they only care about outcomes. but that’s exactly the problem – their framework treats genocide as just another variable to optimize around instead of the human & ethical tragedy it is in irl and it’s not a bug; it’s the system working as designed.

    so when people choose not to operate inside the american system’s confines – where genocide is a natural outcome – they aren’t being naive. they’re rejecting that system entirely. they’re acting like deontologists in a world that only rewards teleologists. that’s not a misunderstanding. that’s a refusal.

    it’s a refusal and the only sane response to a system that has genocide and ethnic-cleansing baked into its logic.







  • i agree, but it still goes deeper than that. i used the liberal/maga divide because liberals seem to place a higher premium on critical thinking than maga supporters do and also as a basis to show that critical thinking alone often isn’t enough – based on the rabbit holes I’ve followed:

    i’ll keep using north korea as an example, since it’s the clearest case I can think of right now. The us gov’t has already admitted to manufacturing propaganda and this fact has been public domain knowledge for decades at this point, yet much of that propaganda is still widely believed to be true nonetheless. wikipedia and american history books probably repeat this narrative more often than others, portraying north korea as a hermit kingdom with despotic rulers. If you approach this with critical thinking, you’d naturally conclude those portrayals are accurate based on the information that’s readily available to you on wikipedia and history books. But if you dig deeper into the references that these sources used in wikipedia and those history books, you’ll find that nearly all – if not all – are either directly or indirectly funded by the U.S. government. ie usaid, national endowment for democracy, radio free asia, etc.

    so even if you follow this one tenet of critical thinking – keeping your identity separate from your beliefs – you’ll still end up believing the propaganda, because the seemingly objective evidence already aligns with what you likely believed in the first place and is repeated from all sources that are fostered by the american gov’t. it’s only sources not elevated by the american gov’t that either have a neutral or favorable characterization of north korea, but they’re so few in number and presence that it takes additional effort to find them – just like the freedom of information act revelations.