Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)D

dustyData

@ dustyData @lemmy.world

Posts
2
Comments
1450
Joined
3 yr. ago

  • where are all the maga sports feminists

    Jump

  • Being part of a minority really highlights how horrible some sport's cultures can be. If you are a gay or female fan of any sport you have to pick your social circles like navigating a minefield. Lest you end up in the homophobic “let's lynch the gay guy” or the “gang rape the only woman here” fan-club.

    Sure, the vast majority of sport spaces are not that extreme, but it only takes one, and unfortunately they are a pretty much non-zero number. Sometimes just watching a game alone in you living room can expose you to casual homophobia and misogyny depending on the commenters.

  • ‘A feedback loop with no brake’: how an AI doomsday report shook US markets

    Jump

  • The proponent is a rather successful and rational investor. This was satire, meant to evoke the idea that, if AI was all that the con men are selling, it would collapse the economy. It is not and everyone knows it, but the point is to highlight the idiocy and try to wake up people to the absurdity. I see it akin to what "a modest proposal" was. To nudge the most radical AI ideologues into understanding the dead economy and ghost GDP concepts. If the economy becomes detached from human reality, it will crumble and collapse.

  • Xbox Co-founder Says Microsoft is Quietly Sunsetting the Platform

    Jump

  • Isn't it ironic? The only Microsoft product that makes money consistently is based on Linux.

  • Bcachefs creator claims his custom LLM is 'fully conscious'

    Jump

  • Intelligence is not reduced to producing speech or complex reasoning. Hence why calling LLMs AI was always disingenuous.

    Intelligence is an extremely complex and multi factor phenomenon. With a wide range of definitions, dimensions and degrees. Your cat is intelligent, some ML models are very intelligent. But, so they are certain blobs of fungi rhizome. A cluster of neurons in a petri dish, and a few hyper specific automation scripts can also be intelligent. An LLM can display intelligence. But that doesn't mean it is conscious or that it is AGI, or that it can be classified as a person.

    Those are all entirely different things.

  • AI tool OpenClaw wipes the inbox of Meta's AI Alignment director despite repeated commands to stop — executive had to manually terminate the AI to stop the bot from continuing to erase data

    Jump

  • You know this saying in ICT: Everyone has a development environment, a lucky few also have a separate production environment.

    I witnessed it first hand on IBM, three in the morning, troubleshooting a database problem for a big client. Engineer writes up a script to try and solve the issue, I was the systems operator. Tells me to just run it on the mainframe.

    “Wait, was this tested at all?”

    “Client authorized it, they just want the downtime gone. Send it.”

    So I just ran an untested script that fundamentally changed everything on the production database, written by a sleep deprived engineer that just wanted to go back to sleep. Granted, it worked, that one engineer was an old rockstar who had been with the client for over a decade. But the next three weeks were dedicated to tiptoeing around the changes of this one script and testing everything, in production, to make sure that the solution was viable long term and it didn't break anything unseen. We all knew better, but everyone agreed and did it anyways.

  • How ICE and CBP Use Free Walkie-Talkie App ‘Zello’ to Power Their Operations

    Jump

  • It is just voice messages automated. That's all. You push to talk, it records your voice message, then sends it to everyone in the channel (group chat). Everyone gets a notification and the message automatically plays on their end. It creates the semblance of radio comms, but everything is recorded and kept in a group chat history. It also depends on service data coverage, since it is just an internet app and that's all. Basic features like dispatcher mode, diffusion and complex multi-channel setups are paid under a premium subscription. They sell some hardware that interoperates with the app in a radio like fashion as well, but it is all third party, so quality varies a lot. Also, I'm not aware anyone has ever done a security audit on them, the thing is entirely proprietary and closed source, it tracks location as well, so I wouldn't necessarily trust it.

  • seriously

    Jump

  • On one hand, yes, sure, fuck those people, 100%. On the other hand, remember that those people are encouraged and most likely exist only because of disinformation propaganda campaigns designed, promoted and delivered by the same bus load of people. So, you know, perspective.

  • How far back in time can you understand English? This site goes back by centuries allowing you to test yourself.

    Jump

  • And that's just the reading part. Phonetic changes will make the spoken word unintelligible a bit ways before that.

  • Facts

    Jump

  • KDE literally comes with a manual. Hitting f1 almost anywhere will give you a help tool that explains everything in detail.

  • Facts

    Jump

  • Just want to remind everyone that the point of this scene is that Draper is an unstable and insecure man that is actually obsessed about how everyone around him are perceiving him, all the time. So this line is just stupid bravado, because he thinks the phrase projects the image he wants others to have of himself. He is lying because he actually thinks about what others think of him constantly. He works in advertising ffs.

  • Spotify says its best developers haven't written a line of code since December, thanks to AI

    Jump

  • My problem with Spotify shuffle was that it always ended up throwing a similar order of songs. The same group of songs would end up in the same general position on the playlist every time. It's not random, and it stands to reason that people doesn't actually want real random order. But it was super obvious, noticeable and quite annoying to hit the same songs at the same time on your walk every single time. They even admitted publicly that their shuffle function sucks.

  • Spotify says its best developers haven't written a line of code since December, thanks to AI

    Jump

  • In what I've seen, the best masons are on construction sites planning the work before hand. The inexperienced and newby masons mix mortar and carry bricks around. The top elder guys lead the prep work planing when and where stuff needs to be for what is being built. But once the machine starts mixing the cement all those guys do is lay bricks.

    They don't shovel, they don't mix mortar, they don't carry materials. Just laying brick after brick until they run out of materials or the construction is done. It's quite mesmerizing to see a good contractor working efficiently, rare but fascinating.

  • DHS shot her and called her a “terrorist.” New videos show something different.

    Jump

  • I wouldn't say that neither Germany nor Japan had a normal that they went back to after WWII. Both countries are politically, demographically and culturally very different today from their pre war selves.

  • "People who rape children are people too!"

    Jump

  • One of the saddest things I learned from working with convict's mental health was that an alarming amount of child abusers weren't pedophiles. It was a crime of opportunity, not desire, for most of them. And that sort of fucks you up, because most people want a neatly ordered world, however, bad people will do horrible things regardless of whatever neat little boxes society wants to create to put them into.

  • "Erased"

    Jump

  • So now we are quoting Korzibsky. Remember that its development, Bateson for example, has as a consequence of the ontological limitations of sensible experience, that one could say the territory is ultimately inaccessible to the mind. Why bother with it thus, since the hypothetical tree only exist because the mind has thus elaborated it and put it in the hypothetical forest to make it fall by sheer will of the model, based on previous sensible experience. A falling tree has to be observed and mapped, in order for a mind to conceive a tree that falls unseen. Its reality cannot be asserted but post-hoc, after observing evidence of its fall. Or ex-ante, by predicting its hypothetical fall by way of a priori evidence.

    Or perhaps consider the Bonini's paradox whereas a model as complex and specific as the reality it represents would be impractical and useless for science. To delve and insists on a science that removes the human is folly. The models we create exist entirely within the limits of the mind. Or as Brudilliard puts it:

    Today abstraction is no longer that of the map, the double, the mirror, or the concept. Simulation is no longer that of a territory, a referential being or substance. It is the generation by models of a real without origin or reality: A hyperreal. The territory no longer precedes the map, nor does it survive it. It is nevertheless the map that precedes the territory—precession of simulacra—that engenders the territory.

    The model precedes reality. In fact, what reality we can think about if there is no thinking mind to model it? To question what reality would be without a human to think it, is circular idiocy. Suggesting to remove morality from the model requires one to create a thinker without morals, a non human, effectively an alien, that would not be any more real than the moral one. In fact, it would be further removed from reality, as the observer doesn't exist but on the map. What reality can be attested by a meeple that stands over a map?

  • "Erased"

    Jump

  • To remove morality you have to remove humans. No humans, no politics and no science.

    You can't argue with that. You either have morals and science, or you have pure objective amoral reality but no humans.

    Objective truth is an oxymoron, to have objectivity you have to remove the subject. Thus eliminating the dichotomy entirely and making the argument collapse. To have true-false value arguments and statements, you need subjectivity and a frame of reference. This is a logical constraint, without anyone to observe and judge the truth, there's no objective reality to be judged. Minerals and crystals, despite our best efforts, do not elaborate moral judgements, and they definitely don't conduct science.

  • DHS shot her and called her a “terrorist.” New videos show something different.

    Jump

  • Historical lesson from first hand experience. There is no return to normal. Political history has no undo button. The social and psychological changes that created and have been caused by this administration are permanent. The USA will never be the same.

    Dealing with it in a "go back" POV is a losing strategy. It disconnects from reality. Instead go for a forward thinking approach, face the conflict and reality head on or you will be forever at the mercy of the dictator.

  • Why does most American's give shit to the French when if not for them we would have lost the revolution?

    Jump

  • The French were part of the inspiration for the Geneva conventions. Due to the massive and horrific destruction the battle of Solferino caused amongst civilians.

  • "Erased"

    Jump

  • It works if it weren't unethical doesn't make the argument you think it makes.

    The notion that we suck at choosing the good genes is entirely misled, even if it is just sarcasm. The final question is also morally misled because science and the notion of truth is not amoral. Science, without humans, doesn't exist. And humans are moral beings (constrained by social and moral considerations).

    Eugenics is one such field which notions cannot be true because its axioms are inherently unethical. "It works" is not an isolated amoral argument. If it needs the morals of a society to be radically altered to work, then it is not science. It is just racism in a lab coat. The case of dog breeds, for example, doesn't support eugenics. On the contrary it dispproves it.

    We have genetically altered dogs (and many other animals) by selective breeding in ways that, according to eugenics, should've eliminated inbreeding and genetic defects. Guess what? it hasn't done that and actually might have made it worse. Historical analysis lead us to the idea that running wild with eugenics will always lead to genocide, regardless of which genetic traits are selected as the best, eugenics is genocide. So, it cannot be severed from its ethical considerations. Science cannot exist devoid of ethics.

  • World Politics @lemmy.world
    dustyData @lemmy.world

    I Can Prove Maduro Got Trounced

    www.wsj.com /articles/i-can-prove-maduro-got-trounced-venezuela-election-stolen-772d66a0
  • Linux @lemmy.ml
    dustyData @lemmy.world

    What is you backup tool of choice?