Of course, because that's what kids do. Kids have ALWAYS done stupid shit against the warnings of their parents/teachers. The difference is adults in the past haven't usually given kids easy access to dangerous shit. And in the past the parents would normally be shamed for doing the dangerous shit that they tell kids not to do.
Use your example, pipe bombs: are they easily accessible just by reaching over and grabbing one off the kitchen counter? Because that's how easy it is to grab a cell phone and use AI or TikTok. Do we have Superbowl ads for pipe bombs? Do we have celebrity endorsements for pipe bombs? Do adults happily use pipe bombs on the regular?
Use a different example: smoking or alcohol. While parents will use them both to varying degrees, we as a society have banned kids from doing them. We don't just leave it up to kids to take our warning that both are bad for them.
I clearly don't know it for a fact that TSMC has done that, but the idea is a widely talked about strategy for protection. U.S. politicians even talk openly to the press about us blowing up the fabs if Taiwan doesn't.
No, it's that companies aren't willing to pay the salaries of engineers in the US. The US pumps out thousands of fresh engineers every year, but the starting salary of a new engineer in the US is $110k while the starting salary of new engineer in the UK is around $33k. In France it is closer to $75k.
And this isn't isolated to engineering, either. In the TV industry, they are finding it is cheaper to fly game show contestants to London to shoot a 30 min game show than it is to shoot it in the US.
While the CHIPS act was started under Biden, it was completely different from what is being done now. It was about developing a domestic source of semiconductors as a hedge against Taiwan being invaded and was done cooperatively with the Taiwanese with mutual benefits. The Taiwanese still owned the manufacturing here, so they would still benefit if the Chinese came invaded. Biden was doing what was smart to do and also had benefits for other countries, including EU allies, since everyone knows those plants in Taiwan are rigged to blow at the first hint of invasion..
Trump has removed the benefits and added tariffs and threats. He didn't steal the policy. He inherited it and then changed it to be something evil.
They just merged the Defense Science Board and Defense Innovation Board into one board: the Science, Technology, and Innovation Board... and removed all people of color. The new board is 100% white and mostly male.
Democrats vote for something that should not benefit them and benefits the people as a whole. Republicans do something that makes a change necessary. Democrats vote to TEMPORARILY undo that benefit for the people with a time-based reenacting of the benefit.
You: BOTH SIDES!!
Democrats try to vote for ranked choice voting in some states. Republicans push to outlaw that for the entire country.
So, this CA law is removing the anti-gerrymandering legislation that CA Democrats got enacted. The Democrats proposed a state-wide initiative to stop gerrymandering. It won, and we were all happy. Now we have to remove that legislation because Republicans in other states are going the other direction.
If you think getting 20 Republican governors to sign up for a Constitutional amendment that will destroy the chances of a Republican majority US House is a doable do, then I have a bridge to sell you. The thing is, even proposing it would cost the taxpayers million in all the logistical crap that would happen to have a vote for something guaranteed to fail.
The weird thing is this CA law removed anti-gerrymandering laws. We had a legal barrier here in CA, but this law was to remove that barrier so we could counter TX. It sucked voting for it.
And that is called hunting. Using specialized skills and tools to locate and approach a target in its home environment is hunting.
You say you aren't apologizing for DHS here, but you are fighting really hard against a VERY common use of the word hunt because it makes DHS look bad.
It is using "hunt" in the digital sense. They didn't know who he was or where he lived. They had to force Google to give them his info, which they then used to find his physical address.
Do you think he signed his email with his full name and home address?
No, it was just intentionally posting a story that used a factual but misleading headline to try tricking people into thinking a progressive politician is involved with a pedophile. You know exactly what you were doing.
I only accept the 1989 Nintendo version of Tetris as "Tetris." Anything else is incorrect.
That said, there was a flash game in the early 2000s called Supertris that was amazing and held global high score lists. I played the shit out of that.
They were both Nazis. The Puma brother split off because he suspected Adi of getting him conscripted into the army, which led to him being imprisoned by the Allies.
Yes, but did the three stripes make themselves iconic, or did the innovative business strategies of the brothers make the brand iconic? Would any logo have become iconic just for being associated with the company whose shoes were worn by Jesse Owens?
EDIT: I had my timeline a bit off. Jesse Owens wore Geda shoes, which was the joint shoe company between the two brothers. After they broke up, Adidas became Adolf's shoe brand and Puma becoming Rudolf's.
Of course, because that's what kids do. Kids have ALWAYS done stupid shit against the warnings of their parents/teachers. The difference is adults in the past haven't usually given kids easy access to dangerous shit. And in the past the parents would normally be shamed for doing the dangerous shit that they tell kids not to do.
Use your example, pipe bombs: are they easily accessible just by reaching over and grabbing one off the kitchen counter? Because that's how easy it is to grab a cell phone and use AI or TikTok. Do we have Superbowl ads for pipe bombs? Do we have celebrity endorsements for pipe bombs? Do adults happily use pipe bombs on the regular?
Use a different example: smoking or alcohol. While parents will use them both to varying degrees, we as a society have banned kids from doing them. We don't just leave it up to kids to take our warning that both are bad for them.