This seems incredibly stupid on its face. Someone please give me context that makes it make sense.

By the time the third drone hits the ship it was already badly injured. Incredible job, Ukraine. Keep it up!

Israel with the ad hominem defense “but it’s antisemitic”.

Bold

And they wonder why they can’t compete with the iPhone

The Sears Roebuck catalog was popular

Donkeys and det cord; the classic RPG

Are they just hiring Cuban physicians for pennies?

Communism is incredibly helpful if you are a capitalist and want to pay slave wages to its refugees.

Individuals that sell billion dollar paintings to the Pentagon.

And incredibly professional, given the circumstances.

I saw your previous post but didn’t comment.

IMO KDE neon is just phenomenal. Try the live CD before you make a choice.

Especially in a competitive market where compelling alternatives exist.

Especially in tech.

And especially in software.

The VLC team are heroes. Three cheers.

And they all compete vigorously against one another, behind the scenes!

I don’t want to have to opt out

If the value proposition for users is so great, then make it opt-in!

The fact that they’re not willing to go this far tells you everything you need to know: that it’s user hostile.

This is simply wrong.

Is you release software that YOU OWN as AGPL, there is nothing stopping you from also licensing it as non AGPL, for a fee, in the future. I’m fact this is more possible with AGPL, since it disallows Tivoization.

If there’s a chance you want to make money off of it, AGPL is 1000x better than MIT. Once you release under MIT, a corporation can take it and do anything. If it’s AGPL a company can take it and do anything once they negotiate a license for it, and pay you for the privilege.

Is Erik the dumbest one? I can’t keep them straight.