Rent control causes newer tenants (read: young people) to pay higher rates than older tenants ( old people) because the old tenants are shielded from market rates.
It’s a policy which enriches old people who never move at the expense of new renters.
I know a landlord in a longtime rent stabilized area who would happily pay 50% to the city if he could charge market rates. Some long term tenants are paying a small fraction of the true market rates
Rent control is bad public policy because it makes new tenants subsidize the ones who have lived there longer.
I think equal area maps make a lot of sense, but the one I’ve seen promoted in the past as “fair” is the Peters Projection which is quite frankly trash.
It was designed to preserve angles at the equator, and as a consequence all the shapes at higher latitudes are badly squished in the vertical.
If there has to be distortion to preserve areas, it should squish in both dimensions and try to optimize shapes around the middle latitudes.
It’s the 20s right now. Need the 19-