Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)D
Posts
3
Comments
405
Joined
3 yr. ago

  • Looking at how badly I am getting down voted, I am afraid to say anything too controversial. I have probably been reported several times for being correct.

  • Do you think corpos wouldn't unalive people to increase their profits?

  • What if the corpos threaten to unalive your family?

  • Everybody has their price.

  • You forgot about asking your employees to bring their own toilet paper. That saves a couple bucks.

  • Hmm sarcastic or not sarcastic... This is a hard one. I'm going to guess sarcastic.

  • I tried to be unbiased, but failed. Apple and Linux should be switched.

  • Ah, thanks. I will edit my post.

  • Murder is murder no matter how much the victim had it coming.

    Edit: as others have told me murder is only applicable after conviction. My post here is wrong and dumb.

  • No one is immune to propaganda and the top 1% owns approximately 95% of the media.

    The average Joe is too busy living their life to try to understand anything beyond the basics.

  • Also, the media is very owned by the top 1%. They would lose some money if healthcare became single payer.

  • Yes! This is a form of organization. Which I think is a requirement for getting a more progressive government.

  • I agree with that. I never disagreed with the meme.

    It has never been my position that voting for the lesser evil will solve all of our problems or bring about a progressive government.

    I have only ever argued that voting for the lesser evil will give the people who are trying to organize (us) a better environment for doing so. Voting for the lesser evil helps with the organization. It's weird to me that people are against voting for the lesser evil. I don't get it, I hope someone can explain it to me.

    Can you please stop assuming what positions I have?

  • Which specific issue is systemic?

    I'm confused because you keep on jumping around to different points, you argue against positions that I don't have, and you don't directly answer any of my follow-up questions.

    If I wasn't sure that you honestly believe what you are saying, I would accuse you of intentionally muddying the water. This looks a lot like psyop stuff.

  • How did we get here? I never said we needed to have a "right" specific individual being a leader.

    All I'm saying is that I believe that if I have a choice to organize a progressive movement under either 100% Hitler or 90% Hitler. I would choose 90% Hitler. I feel like I'm not alone in that.

  • Yeah, that makes some sense. But you could just tell people that voting for the lesser evil alone is not enough, you also need to organize. I feel like that is pretty clear. That way you can have your cake and eat it too.

  • How would having a more evil leader, one who hypothetically locks down freedom of speech and starts arresting people, make organizing easier?

    Seems like that would make it harder to do.

  • I did watch the video. I agree that mass movements are what is required for change. I don't understand, what am I buying?