No LGBT rights no visit.

Easy and simple.

You should also known that TikTok does this by default and the generated code is impossible to remove afaik, it’s part of the video identifier.

So when sharing a tiktok video always download it and share the file.

I was educated not to leave trash around when I visited nature.

I mean… China didn’t threat us with war.

They belong to me.

I have as good as a claim on the Islands as Argentina.

Sure as hell the fascist military Junta wasn’t right. I can tell you that.

People who has always live there?

The Maldives has never had Spanish/Argentinian population.

Argentina only claims it based on physical proximity, not on the will of its population.

Who is surprised by this?

He was making slop versions of his own movies before AI.

The gods themselves

I guess it’s not.

Same as yaoi or yuri, it doesn’t need to be sexual. I’m not actually expert on the matter.

I remember watching this famous anime “made in abyss” the drawing style is clearly loli, and there are some heavy loli tones on it. But as far as I’ve seen there’s no sexual content in it, (though I’ve read that the author is indeed shady about sexual content involving minors).

That gives another differentiate factor. There are people that might like lolicon just for the cuteness like hello kitty or something like that. I didn’t actually thought about that.

Oh my god! They are _tiny

Now I cannot unsee it

Precog bouncer. Asigned to the daemon of future cybercrimes. Obviously.

I’m using it. It’s good. Even without the cloud services the bouncer and scenarios are more powerful than fail2ban.

Shame about no self hosted web ui but someone posted here a project I’m ought to look up oncw I arrive home.

I used to keep one cd drive from the 90s in every built. Technically it could be understood as the same pc I just upgraded everything around the cd drive.

Last build I made I finally ditched it. I bought a case with bays just in case but I noticed that I haven’t used it in the last 10 years so I just didn’t install it.

Europe is truly speedruning the mass surveillance thing.

In the last year they have been pushing , chat control, social media age verification and porn age verification.

A wonderful time to be european who doesn’t want to be spy on every single thing you do.

Put it on a bottle, and when the bottle is full take it to the used oil recycling bin in my neighborhood.

This thread is a firestorm but I’m going in, wish me luck.

I think is a connotations game here. Lolicon have less bad connotations than paedophile.

The world paedophile makes you think of a criminal, someone who have content that was made hurting children. Someone who probably has hurt children themselves. Despite the more profound consideration that a paedophile might or might not act on their impulses, the connotation on the word is that.

Then there is the word lolicon. That word have a different connotation. Here you think about some anime geek with terabytes of drawn naked kids. But you don’t tend to associate their behavior with real kids. Regardless on the possibility that lolicons do hurt children or also have material that hurt children. The connotation of the word is that their obsession only focus on the drawn naked children.

Most people in general consider drawn pictures of children less harmful or even not harmful at all compared to actually abusing kids. So one word really doesn’t have the same weight as another.

Then, we have the question. Using a word with more/less weight is justified here or not?

We all now some paedophiles have rebranded themselves as MAPS, precisely trying to shake of the bad connotations of paedophile.

Is this the same case? Is using lolicon trying to evade the “paedophile tag” or is it something actually different?

I get the disgusting feeling about lolicon. But personally I do think is essentially different to what we normally think about a paedophile. If someone told me “X is a paedophile” I would as “so are they in jail?”. But if someone tells me that “X is q lolicon” I won’t assume that they have done something deserving jail time, I’ll probably be wondering if they are also a paedophile, but the fact that I think of it as an “addition” means to me that those are not the same.

On another differentiate fact. I think it’s not uncommon for people to accidentally see lolicon, it has happened to me. Looking for some yaoi you might end up opening a lolicon manga, or maybe you watch an anime and it has some lolicon tones. The normal reaction is not liking it and move on, but it’s not a traumatic experience. I have luckily never watch CP but if somehow it was accidentally showed to me I think it would be a traumatic experience that probably would scar me for life.

So, on the bases that I think different things when I think about each of those words I do not think that’s an accurate translation.

Then there is the question to people who do think those two terms are the same. Do you truly think those two terms refer to the same thing or you just feel so disgusted by lolicon that you want the term lolicon to be viewed with as much disgust as people see paedophile?

Nah. Take out the greedy fuckers that make money out of making technology miserable and give me fully automatic space gay communism.

Every time you don’t want to have a kid for whatever reason is ethical to abort.

What’s not ethical is to have a child you don’t really want.

I live in a opt-out system. That means we are all donors unless we explicitly said the contrary.

I have never heard of a murder for an organ match.

Also I think we are the top one or two in the world on organ transplants.