• 17 Posts
  • 57 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: October 2nd, 2023

help-circle



  • NO, HE IS NOT. The article is written from a place of ignorance, stop sharing it.

    Here is a rebuttal submitted to the author:

    In your recent article you showcase a term that Robert F. Kennedy is using to appeal for access to the US healthcare system: “pro-vaccine safety.” In the article this is called a “screeching U-turn.” I am writing to you today to explain that it is not.

    In his book titled “The Real Anthony Fauci” Robert F. Kennedy uses the same term “pro vaccine safety” as he claims that the hundreds of millions of MMR vaccines safely distributed over the past decades - amounting in millions of lives improved - is not enough for him to believe the vaccine to be safe and effective. In ignoring such overwhelming evidence it becomes clear that claiming to be “pro vaccine safety” is a cover for RFK’s desire to dismantle one of the most significant public health improvements in American history. When articles such as yours are written indicating a change in posture, it aids RFK in rebranding his anti vaccine conspiracies to be more palatable while he yearns for control of this country-accross-the-pond’s public health systems.










  • Thank you for the detailed response. It’s disheartening to consider the traffic is coming from ‘real’ browsers/IPs, but that actually makes a lot of sense.

    I’m coming at this from the angle of AI bots ingesting a website over and over to obsessively look for new content.

    My understanding is there are two reasons to try blocking this: to protect bandwidth from aggressive crawling, or to protect the page contents from AI ingestion. I think the former is doable, and the latter is an unwinnable task. My personal reason is because I’m an AI curmudgeon, I’d rather spend CPU resources blocking bots than serving any content to them.








  • It’s an agree as in I don’t really feel like arguing with another user here. I don’t buy the point about metadata when Signal, a centralized service like Discord (why are we talking about Discord?), may be able to scrape it too. Or the point about anonymity when Signal is far from the right tool for that purpose too, see above “spams your contact list.”

    For reliability, I’m not concerned with how much RAM Signal’s servers have. What I should have highlighted is that Signal can nuke your communications on accident / on purpose / under coercion. And it’s proven because they’ve already done it before. Mitigate that by having a backup system set up? That necessarily doubles your surface area for breaks in privacy or whatever a given user is worried about. So starting with Signal in the first place doesn’t make sense to me.