I don't understand your position. Can you help me understand your point of view?
I'm stuck in my point of view, and all I can think of is if 20 nazis figured they could build another concentration camp for children, if they didn't vote for a bill, would that make the bill that continued funding the first one good on the whole? Even if it funded some libraries?
Listen, I'm not impressed by websites that have a link to a ketamine addicted nazi billionaire’s child porn machine either, but the code I found seems to be Apache-licensed
Basically anything that’s wet is less than useless as insulation. cotton socks, gloves, jeans, and sweaters tend to develop wet spots from your sweat or puddles and conduct the cold right into those areas.
“Companies are structurally set up to collude on salaries, but they’re not set up to deliberately make their employees sad - they just don’t have that kind of fine-grained control over the culture!”
This is such an insane take. I’d argue that hiring freezes are more common dictates than corporations following the law.
A pay for a handful of podcasts, but at the end of the day they’re all still just mp3s on an rss feed. None of them have any way to control how I download or play those mp3s
I don't understand your position. Can you help me understand your point of view?
I'm stuck in my point of view, and all I can think of is if 20 nazis figured they could build another concentration camp for children, if they didn't vote for a bill, would that make the bill that continued funding the first one good on the whole? Even if it funded some libraries?