Certified classical fascist and neo-nazi
Proud zionist, loves war and capital
Also hates stalkers
Normal people: hey man how's it going
The "eat the rich" aka hyperfixation on billionaires narrative as seen in the post. Turns the problem into some moral "some people accumulated too much" rather than being about social relations which doesn't threaten anything, it automatically implies that workers + small and medium capital are somehow on the same side, and if the narrative had its way and billionaires started to get taxed (before adopting tax avoidance methods like family owned NGO's) or somehow got removed in other ways, the newly freed minuscule market space would only benefit the smaller capital, as now they can temporarily take over before the capital's tendency to centralize kicks in once more. Therefore, it's petty bourgeois at best.
Unless this has some new meaning due to Epstein or something, in which case yeah mb, I don't really keep up with The Discourse™ for my own sanity
The dogshit billionaire narrative is very much petty bourgeois, they got plenty of representation already
Yeah, the tens of millions of capitalists and small business owners who rely on exploitation and don't think twice about their workers losing fingers if it were to get their profit rates up are the true victims here.... 🥀
- JumpRemoved
Oh... but...ok..
Capitalists are really good at doing the latter, given how it's necessary to have imperialist wars every once in a while to buy time before economy inevitably implodes
- JumpRemoved
Average American logic 🤡
Liberal nationalistic racism: 😡
Liberal nationalistic racism, third worldist edition: 😇
Bro is literally doing the exact same thing as Hitlers in the west, proclaiming that Russians are asiatic steppe orc hordes but just for a different country
- JumpRemoved
Average American logic 🤡
Yeah, and that's because Americans are genetically reactionary (read settlers kkkracka) and not because of silly nonsense like them living under dictatorship of their national bourgeois who impose values such as patriotism, narratives that suit capital's agenda etc, and thus enforce consent through existing superstructures and media
- JumpRemoved
Communists vs Tankies on voting
Liberals vs Liberals on voting
You have 0 clue on what communism is and their positions, this is genuinely dogshit libslop even if I somewhat agree with the second half's point but for different reasons
More like kill 500 billionaires for them to be instantly replaced by different hitlers and for capitalism and its social relations to continue unimpeded
It's not an individual morals issue
What Musk and media actually taught the public is how everything is actually being ruined by a group of bad men with moral failings who are doing bad politics, and if they disappeared then everything would be sunshine and rainbows
Never said fatphobia isn't an issue - it very much is, and it either stems from or gets heavily amplified by the bourgeois class society we live in. After all, a worker that is overweight might not be as productive, might not fit certain positions and therefore is turned into a moralization or demonization without much nuance. Bring in nationalism and it's an Ubermensch situation.
That being said, this team sport shit slinging at the other side thing is most likely not that deep and is just a competition to see who can say more bad words at the other side with 0 thought
blud is gonna crash out at toddler calling them or someone else fat and stinky with that "fatphobic" point lmao
But seriously, there certainly is a degree of classism and elitism - I remember there was a quite popular post after Trump got elected that basically showed how if people with higher education only were allowed to vote, then Kamala would have won, and the comments went how you'd expect them to go. The sentiment can still be found today in lib news threads, though they are much rarer since Republicans are no longer the hot topic and now it's ICE or whatever.
Though to be fair, it probably has less to do with them hating the poor, obese or people who didn't go for education for any reason and it's just a product of the team sports politics bullshit the vast majority are knee deep in. Gotta cheer your side and throw any insult you can think of at the other!
Bigotry, supporting movements that go against your interests and cause violence aren't necessarily personal failings, it's the result of bourgeois society and our capitalist superstructure and them instilling these values through education, media, communities and so on.
This doesn't apply only to reactionary thought, but also to """truths""" we happen to take for granted like current political economy and mode of production (nobody talks about it anymore and just accepts capitalism as granted, and anti-capitalists are closer to anti-consumerists and reformists), nationalism, electorialism, morality and so on.
Despite how horrible they can be, they're as much of a victim of the system as anyone, and the only way to make them see the truth is to have them experience it for themselves. Same applies to delusional progressives.
"an entire year of people being ILLEGALLY deported or disappeared" true, state violence against anyone is only okay when it's done legally, with due process and for the good of the national people's
Yeah, bourgeois states would never ever develop infrastructure for market expansion and capital accumulation purposes (e.g. building up infrastructure in colonial states to facilitate exports + extract resources or undertaking massive projects such as the Suez and Panama canals), they would never ever nationalize nor have dominant national ownership of their industry for national bourgeois benefit or capital stability (like in Saudi Arabia, fascist Italy, various national oil companies), nor they would have high approval rates like seen in fascist regimes and economic boom periods (entrenched superstructures also make workers "approve" things that go against their interests). Maybe there's more DOTP's out there than I thought....
The idea that development of the productive forces is bad because it implies exploitation is inherently flawed, highly developed productive forces are the basis of socialized production to begin with
Productive forces by themselves are neutral, what matters is the underlying social relations of production. Capitalist mode of production presupposes exploitation via extraction of surplus value and market constrains, which is not only exploitative but also conflicts with the long-term worker interest that is production-for-use. Expansion of exploitation goes against working class interests, that much is hopefully obvious - you're not gonna find anyone but bourgeois or workers deep in nationalist superstructure being happy about their nation state having GDP growth.
On the other hand, a society that produces for use rather than for profit that doesn't have the exploitative surplus extraction mechanism - now that and it's growth is inherently in the interests of the working class.
China hasn't made even the most gradual of shifts towards this, it's a full on market economy that maintains the exploitative relation and sometimes merely transfers ownership around, but this doesn't materially affect the relationship between the worker and means of production.
Mere promises for the "future plans" do not alter the bourgeois essence of the economy as it stands now in China, and I highly doubt that a state maintaining this essence that is in it's national material interests will one day just do a 180, completely go against those interests and abolish the current state of things.
All of the actual benefits are being given to the working classes on a steady and constant basis. Their quality of life has steadily gone up dramatically year over year, in a fundamentally far greater degree than social democracies offer by ratio, without bribery from imperialism.
This is true for literally most capitalist countries during its active development, or after WW2. It is also a blatantly anti-marxist socdem narrative, as the marxist goal is abolishment of current state of things rather than merely making things temporarily better until capitalist contradictions inevitably catch up and result in crisis.
Most of what you've pointed out just now isn't even in the interest of the working class, nor is it somehow exclusive to AES states - rather, these are just common interests held by bourgeois states.
GDP growth by itself indicates greater capital accumulation, which in turn indicates that a greater degree of worker exploitation has been achieved in a commodity producing society, directly going against worker interests. Same with maintaining the existence of bourgeois and their economic position under the guise of "helping GDP grow" for obvious reasons - it's just absurd.
Aside from that, national/public ownership also doesn't automatically mean "in workers interests". For instance, majority of capitalist countries early on had or still have their means of public transportation (railroad, buses) nationally owned. Does it mean these parts were "socialist"? Of course not - cheap public transportation allows workers to travel cheaply and faster to their workplaces, which in turns allows capital to expand and accumulate value more efficiently. In other words, their purpose was capital growth.
All in all, my main point is that despite China being labeled as a DOTP, it purely advances its national capitalist interests and does nothing to advance proletarian interests. There might be incidental benefits for the proletariat here and there (as is the norm under capitalism, economic growth sometimes bringing better standard of living and infrastructure improvements), but all the actual advancements of worker interests are promised way, way into the future.
And hey - maybe China will actually achieve communist mode of production purely on its own which would largely debunk orthodox marxism, only time will tell.
If China's bourgeois were truly powerless with no leverage and there's no class collaborationism going on, they wouldn't keep them and instead nationalize everything - after all, why keep a parasitic middle man that just sucks up billions in surplus value? To build up productive forces the bourgeois aren't necessary - the state could handle it just fine.
Also, despite being a "DOTP", China goes against worker interests almost every step of the way. Commodity production fundamentally relies on exploitation of workers and is in the interest of capital, the supposed proletarian party is actively letting bourgeois to join as seen with Three Represents for instance, independent labor unions are crushed, international proletariat interests are also being betrayed by China (like supporting Ukraine, their recent affairs within Africa, the junta I mentioned), economic imperialism via initiatives such as BRI, etc.
Painting a bourgeois nation red is such an effective strategy to fool leftists I swear. Maybe once third imperialist war drops, every bourgeois state is gonna be calling themselves socialist! Who knows....
Nothing screams socialism more than class collaboration, active expansion of commodity production and commodity accumulation, funding military junta in Myanmar and so on. At this point China would only become socialist if its capital forces magically became conscious and went against it's own interests.
Also good job with the slander on that last paragraph. All nation states are hitlerite, no matter if global north or south as they all brutalize their proles, are ruled by bourgeois and would happily go colonialist imperialist if they were in an economic position that necessitated it. The real chauvinism is putting some states on a pedestal and masking it with moralizing bullshit.
Also you ought to know the difference between "arbitrary collapse wouldn't be useful and would just bring unnecessary suffering" vs "I support this empire and hope it stays forever!". I'd much rather see all the contradictions result in US becoming a genuine DOTP once workers there finally wake up rather than millions dying for no reason other than revengeism and for some other capitalist state to take over.
Third worldists WILL be the first targets of red terror for posting absolute coal 🥀