Those who ignored history are the most dangerous.

Same to that sentiment!

Horrible take.

To be privilege enough to take on that firehose…

I mean do those numbers add up? Even at one per week, that’s like 52 per year on average? Each of em would have to have 10s of millions to add up to 1/15 of US population.

Is it magical?

So interesting!

Awful. Headline number still seems high when there’s hundreds of millions in the USA.

Ah interesting! TIL. Thank you!

Talk about irrelevant comment. Blocked.

Theu don’t verify emails and the CEO has even suggested we can use a random string. Also, you can pay with Bitcoin. No forced KYC anywhere along the way.

Eh, doesn’t discouraged me from using em. For me is them or Google. As those are the only two useable engines for my type of surfing.

Hmm, so no firewall in the router blocking ports, instead blocking happens on the actual client?

How does IPV6 makes port forwarding possible?

Well, I’m talking about my use case which involves my own threat model. Regardless if it matches yours or not, it’s still a complain I can share about the current state of browsers.

Great for anonymity but has the same security baggage that gecko based browsers havem

Like I said, security is what I’m talking about. Brave browser, as much as I dislike the company is the best compromise when looking for both.

Just not what I’ve read from security engineers or other sources like GrapheneOS devs. A lot of the flaws on mobile also apply to desktop. Just turns out engineering man power is a huge deal for secure browsers.

Sucks they’re not close to as secure as chromium based browsers. Where’s my privacy and security first browser ☹️ Vandium is the only thing close to that. Can’t wait for desktop version.

Source?