You're a mess. Appealing to experience doesn't work when you demonstrably have no idea what you're talking about.
I'm criticizing your reasoning for not using Wayland. You claimed there were tons of issues, it was unpolished, etc. But when pressed, all you could do was point to GNOME. You couldn't even define the problem until someone told you the term fractional scaling.
Then you told us in your own words that you wanted to stick with "XFCE" instead of "Wayland". The former is a DE. The latter is a series of protocols acting as a compositor. Why would you compare them? Nobody who actually understands these technologies would compare them. It's nonsensical. You meant to say X11, not XFCE.
That leads me to the reason for my vigor: you're making shit up to justify your stubbornness. Which doesn't need justifying. Just say you're stubborn without all the bullshit and you won't look so silly.
The fact that you're comparing Wayland to XFCE tells us you're not entirely sure what you're doing. One is a compositor and the other is a distribution.
Your problems are with GNOME. I dont even think you could define what X11 and Wayland are based on your posts, much less articulate why one is better than the other
Start by reading about Wayland. Don't make shit up and defend a position you can't even articulate. It's cringe.
This is the same as doctors calling people fat. They're serious. You're fat and have to lose weight to be healthy.
Dentists aren't doing this to antagonize you. It has nothing to do with the "toughness" of your gums. They're telling you that your gums are nasty and you have to actually floss them. Gums bleed during dental visits primarily because of gingivitis and decaying food trapped along the gum lines. Brushing alone is not sufficient for oral hygiene.
I cannot relate in any way. I would tell these people to figure it out themselves and that they're ignorant and ungrateful. You're also a very nice person for putting up with that.
You're a mess. Appealing to experience doesn't work when you demonstrably have no idea what you're talking about.
I'm criticizing your reasoning for not using Wayland. You claimed there were tons of issues, it was unpolished, etc. But when pressed, all you could do was point to GNOME. You couldn't even define the problem until someone told you the term fractional scaling.
Then you told us in your own words that you wanted to stick with "XFCE" instead of "Wayland". The former is a DE. The latter is a series of protocols acting as a compositor. Why would you compare them? Nobody who actually understands these technologies would compare them. It's nonsensical. You meant to say X11, not XFCE.
That leads me to the reason for my vigor: you're making shit up to justify your stubbornness. Which doesn't need justifying. Just say you're stubborn without all the bullshit and you won't look so silly.