I’m also on Mastodon as https://hachyderm.io/@BoydStephenSmithJr .

  • 1 Post
  • 412 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: October 2nd, 2023

help-circle
  • I’m not opposed to those ideas, but I think UBI need not wait on them and is a lot easier to implement. We could do UBI now, and let state/collectively provided services be a provider-of-last-resort type thing, start with pilot programs and scale based on demand.

    I agree that UBI can be less when there are more universal services, but I think there are a lot of “basics” that aren’t universal or at least aren’t uniform. Some people consider meat a basic foodstuff. Housing is rarely truly one-size-fits-all, primarily due to sleeping preferences. Healthcare has genetic components all over, so those vary from person to person. (Broadly you might think of menstruation supplies, or sickle-cell treatment, but there are much subtler genetic aspects.) Etc. UBI has a flexibility to incorporate capitalist providers into universal coverage as needed.

    But, yeah, we absolutely need more controls on Capitol to deal with abuses like gouging. We need to enforce the ones we have on the books, but we also need more.





  • Maybe he’s got a finer point, but it actually just looks like an argument against categorization. It’s like saying I don’t trust math about “triangles” or “scalene triangles” or “rhombuses” when you find out about the special properties of the equilateral triangle or the square.

    The fact that there are differences between elements of a category does not eliminate the utility of the commonalities shared by elements of a category. It does limit that utility, yes.

    For example, just because you are getting plenty of protein, if you somehow completely avoid one of the amino acids that the human body uses but can’t synthesize, then eventually you will have some fairly specific health problems. That’s not strong evidence that it’s worth micromanaging your macronutrients by tracking your intake of all amino acids individually. (It might be; I haven’t seen it studies either way.)

    Maybe I’m missing some context, but I also get the “anti-science” vibe from the image.


  • Justice can be achieved without racism.

    Actually, it can’t. Since racism caused the injustice, identifying the victims and restoring their losses is impossible without using it.

    The pendulum swing (post-dampening) is the only practical way to get to justice.

    This is especially true since we can’t know we’ve achieved societal justice without some measurement delay.



  • bss03@infosec.pubtomemes@lemmy.worldOh hell yeah
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    There’s no option for me to choose a copyright-free world. But, I can choose to not use (or promote or propagate) works made by “AI” owned my MASSIVE corporations in violation of the copyrights of millions of independent, often non-profit-driven content creators (including myself).



  • I agree. I don’t really see any problem with her performing the play.

    BUT, I’m not sure the library should be forced to let her use the space (or be assessed civil penalties). So, I don’t think she should sue or that the suit should go her way.

    I could be convinced if the library is supposed to be providing performing space to the public and the library is controlled/funded by the government. Then, I think she might have free speech protections, especially after they had done some scheduling. Asking her to change the characters definitely seems like content policing, not mere “time and manner” control.