Debian is like the Unitarian Universalists of distros. “You’re here? You’re here! That’s great!”
Debian is like the Unitarian Universalists of distros. “You’re here? You’re here! That’s great!”
Yeah, that’s probably a better phrasing.
People weren’t using them ambiguously, drive manufactures picked a non-standard unit to lie with on their boxes, and then tricked courts into going along with their shit because it was the old case of money vs truth.
I’ll assume you’re being intentionally obtuse because no one could actually be that dumb.
Unfortunately, I am not from the EU region, neither do I live in one
So, the GDPR doesn’t apply to you. So, you’re probably SOL?
Sure, verifying chicken is deboned before it leaves the factory makes more sense than installing x-ray machines at every pizzeria.
I love everything about that. Even a small tech demo with like one kind of item and a single quest would be really cool.
That’s the thing that scares me the most, actually. That in order to ensure humanity’s survival, all we need to do is cure the dark greed in every man’s heart.
Otherwise, we’ll just end up with carbon credit style solutions that ensure we transfer ownership of emissions at a heavily discounted rate, rather than making less emissions.
I’m going to need a lot more details before this stops sounding like the craziest idea I’ve heard all month.
Yeah, those are the guys!
It’s also a slush fund pork-barrel for screening device manufacturers! (alwayshasbeen.meme)
Nah, it’s a repost from late 2007.
Sorry, I mean a repeat of late 2007, the fourth or fifth “once in a lifetime economic crisis” for millennials that will somehow magically end with billionaires owning an even larger percentage of the GDP.
“How could this possibly happen, again, again, again, again,” will cry the economists billionaire simps.
Imagine hating an ordained minister for not hating enough. Ridiculous.
The good old, “If it’s not your source, it’s not your computer.”
He’s been a week away from shutting down for… a dozen years?
Used to be, “the tragedy of the commons” didn’t quite so literally mean an attack on the common resources.
That’s not very reassuring, we’re still only one computer bug away from that situation.
Presumably she wasn’t identified as a violent criminal because the facial recognition system didn’t associate her duplicate with that particular crime. The system would be capable of associating any set of crimes with a face. It’s not like you get a whole new face for each different possible crime. So, we’re still one computer bug away from seeing that outcome.
It’s an extremely compelling product story full of market segmentation advertisers dream of!
H100 isn’t $40, it’s $40,000. You’re making the Bloomberg Mistake: it costs $4,000,000,000 - four billion.
I can’t wait to see what clownshoes nonsense way he absolutely fucks this one up, but that’ll take a lot of liquidity he probably doesn’t have access to unless he gets the $45bn Tesla payout.
How would he know? Trump doesn’t talk to him.