6·
19 hours agoI would have guessed “creative consultant on the new Harry Potter TV series”.
- 11 Posts
- 482 Comments
Joined 3 years ago
Cake day: June 27th, 2023
You are not logged in. If you use a Fediverse account that is able to follow users, you can follow this user.
The trouble with the Millennium Prize problems is that they didn’t pick one involving counting letters in fruit.
I don’t think this bill would force us to gather driver’s licenses to let people use awful.systems, but depending on the regulations promulgated by the state later, it potentially could. Mastodon is more likely to be hit than Lemmy, since it offers “infinite scroll” and “like counts”, which are features that politicians have decided are Satanic.
And the slightest bit of investigation reveals that TW is full of bunk.
Fuck, I dunno, I’m ranking these on pure insomnia
“AI techbro syndicate looking shady as fuck to nobody’s surprise” —an actual rabbi
Somewhere in the review, they mention having left academia for industry. Hopefully that worked out well for them.
“Hey, no kink shaming!”
“But it’s… Aella.”
“All right. One (1) kink-shaming.”
In the TESCREAL lore iceberg, “Aella Sankey chart” is above the waterline.
- Existence of HPMoR
- Existence of Zizians
- Aella Sankey chart
- Aella not showering
…
- Topher Brennan leaks Siskind emails
…
- “AI datacenter water usage is fine actually” Substack
…
- Cremieux’s alleged old Reddit handle
…
- Scott Aaronson anti-feminist breakdown
- Scott Aaronson goes full Zionist
…
- Glowfic
…
- su3su2u1 review of HPMoR
…
- Robot God deduces general relativity in three frames with the power of Bayes
…
- Scott Aaronson makes airport cops sympathetic
…
- TracingWoodgrains attempted hatchet job against David Gerard
…
- Eliezer Yudkowsky is That Guy when recommending scifi books
Open Letter about the Mathathon
This open letter calling for the cancellation of the Caltech “Mathathon”, has received 471* signatures so far. [Only members of the Caltech community or mathematicians at PhD student level or beyond are eligible to sign.]
* Now 771 signatures.
“On October 30th, 2026, Caltech will begin hosting the Caltech Mathathon, a math hackathon in which participants are encouraged to solve open research problems by prompting LLMs. Two prominent AI companies, Anthropic and OpenAI, will supply participants with 2 million dollars in AI credits. This event is likely to have destructive impacts for the mathematical community.”
https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSf6dBeDwjRP4UkchGSpLwLQjiG8qLX5_wW_3-xoC4dImTPp6g/viewform
Status of my evening:
Post a link to my personal website, find out a minute later that it’s “down for maintenance”, try to log into my web hosting dashboard (Siteground) to figure out what’s going on, it rejects the 2FA code it sends me, then the 2FA code suddenly works, then the dashboard is full of hard-selling slop features that I will gouge out my left eye with a spork and skull-fuck the hole with the blunt end before I will use… My blog seems to be back now, though?
Fuck, I need to migrate my blog. If there is even anywhere to migrate it to.
And the bonus advantage of an academic community of which a sizable fraction is willing to burn leaded gasoline to truck the child laborers into the sweatshop to paint asbestos with radium, if it’ll get them arXiv posts.
OpenAI:
While unlikely, we cannot rule out that de-identified data derived from their usage of our products helped improve our models.
https://blacksky.community/profile/did:plc:i4bfh2tyxihe2ksplmtcoopk/post/3muznyls6vk2v
lmao what the fuck do you mean it’s unlikely but you can’t rule it out. do you not know what you’re training your models on? are you guys unaware of what’s going on in your own operation? does openai research not have any knowledge of what data they train their models on?
Previously in Hossenfelder’s appearances on awful dot systems:
When they are using science fiction as a venue to be weirdly horny, what are they weirdly horny for, and in how many star systems do they know the age-of-consent laws?
Recycling previous joke: https://awful.systems/post/6373632/9569779
Whereas the successful polyamorists know that humans evolved in order to use calendar software.
We don’t need more of mathematics to look like the Four Color Theorem (“proved”, but with no insight gained), with the added problems that the “proofs” are now far more laborious to check even for technical correctness, theorem-proving software is less reliable, and oh yeah, we’re holding the population of Memphis to the exhaust pipe of a diesel bus to make it work.
“Polyamory” is the excuse that abusive men use now the way they used “free love” in the 1960s. I know people who make the poly thing work; they’re honest and communicative, traits that I do not associate with lesswrongs.
There’s a huge difference between having a single counterexample and having a theory that explains where and why counterexamples occur, and what constraints are needed to avoid them. The former are rubies; the latter, wisdom.