Skip Navigation

Posts
0
Comments
14
Joined
3 yr. ago

  • why would you do a lossy to lossy conversion when verything under the sun can play aac natively?

  • there are lots of digital music stores.

  • You don’t need iTunes to manage an iPod. There are tons of alternative apps, as well as plugins for music players like foobar2000 and Winamp.

    iPods are still great. You can even replace their hard drives with modern flash storage and they work. It’s actually really impressive, i built a 256GB iPod Mini and iTunes has no problem with it. For the Mini, any compact flash card works as a drop-in replacement for the hard drive. Other models require a cheap adapter.

  • it’s also not a good way of actually figuring out who is critical.

    you can have people who keep the lights on and if they do their job right few even notice they exist.

  • A website isn’t a common carrier, you cannot argue that a website isn’t allowed to control who they serve their content to. An ISP is a common carrier because they simply act as a dumb pipe between the provider (websites) and the consumer.

    Cloudflare is a tool websites use to exercise that right, necessitated by the ever rising prevalence of bots and DDoS attacks. Your proposed definition of net neutrality would destroy anyone’s ability to deal with these threats.

    Can you at least provide examples of legitimate users who are hindered by the use of Cloudflare?

  • I’ve always wondered, what do Comcast’s boots taste like?

  • relevant username

  • Given that the FBI’s targets probably don’t type in Chinese or other logographic languages very often i doubt they care.

  • You can also get around this by using a non-airline owned travel metasearch engine like Kayak.

  • tbf perl nerds still are some of the nerdiest of nerds

  • Having worked in this field, I can tell you how it usually operates: You want the most data for the least amount of investment. As soon as your operational costs start to eat into your already thin margins, the equation falls apart.

    Complex solutions designed to capture data from that 1-3% of users who actively avoid it end up costing a lot more money than their data is actually worth. In order to make this particular solution work, you need to make enough money selling whatever tiny amount of data you get from those 1-3% of users to cover the cost of putting a cellular modem in all of your TVs plus the ongoing cost of paying various regional cellular networks to deliver that data to you. You are likely tripling or quadrupling the total cost of your data collection operation and all you have to show for it is a rounding error. And that is before we factor in the fact that these users likely aren't using the built in streaming apps, so the quality of the data you get from them is below average.

  • Thinking about it, i can't remeber a time in the last decade that a game made me feel that way. Crysis was probably the last time.

    Some games that did it for me recently:

    • Cyberpunk with its new RT Overdrive features.
    • Portal RTX

  • Google absolutely is in the business of selling user data, through their ad network. AdSense customers use that data to target ads. It’s their whole business model. Just because they aren’t being given a database with all that data doesn’t mean they aren’t paying for access to it.

    Facebook operates the same way.