I also dislike Iran's political system, but overall the US has killed, maimed, tortured and ruined the lives of many more people then Iran's government ever could. US is currently the most evil country on this planet, and has been in the running ever since its founding.
But even then, let's suppose for a second that somehow Iran's government is more evil. So what? Bombing Tehran city center, destroying mosques and museums, causing an immense ecological disaster by blowing up oil reservoirs, and double-tapping an all-girls school with tomahawks will not help the people of Iran in any way. It made their lives measurably, verifiably worse for generations.
US has been doing the exact same shit to leftists ever since the founding of USSR, this is not new. Sadly the tea party people have nothing to worry about.
Ok, so correct me if I'm wrong, but usually the reason you do this is because the cost to produce this benefit is lower than the price you usually sell it for, so you can inflate the claimed value of the benefit, both to appeal to candidates and to write it off on your taxes. But at the moment tokens are usually sold way below cost (i.e. the companies are not profitable), so why the fuck would any company do this? Are they this short on cash now?
I can’t remember the site, now, but I literally couldn’t log into one this week because the email never arrived.
Well, email allows you to solve that issue by self-hosting. But what you can't solve is that if you do self-host, gmail will drop your emails to spam or just discard them completely, just because it feels like it, even if you do the whole dance with DMARC and have used the domain for a good few years. It's frustrating as shit.
The previous bush-era logic of "Dave slapped me because I was an asshole to everyone in the class, so now I'm going to torture and kill Rick who kinda looks like Dave to me" was not much better
Well, technically the condition was to expel the israeli and US ambassadors. This is the other way around, and AFAIK withdrawing your own ambassador is considered a less aggressive move than expelling the ambassador of the other country. And either way I strongly doubt they will do anything about their US relationship. So this seems to be just a based thing to do rather than trying to comply with iranian demands
edit: it seems israel already withdrawn their ambassador from Spain last May, so this move now feels completely unrelated to the demands.
This is a really naive take - this amendment (which requires message scanning to be targeted) passed with a slim majority and could well have failed. In that case the existing mass surveillance ("voluntary scanning") would probably keep happening at least until 2028.
The council meanwhile is overwhelmingly pro-message-scanning, and they (together with the commission) are the ones who are pushing to break e2e encryption. There will now be talks between the three institutions to decide on how to proceed. Sadly I expect that some "compromise" will be reached eventually.
I get your point, but if you actually go out and speak with women who trust you, chances are they will all have multiple stories of harassment and/or SA that will make your skin crawl. It's not just fearmongering, there are a lot of awful men out there (in absolute terms)
I'm surprised how many (well-meaning) men are clueless about this horrible aspect of life which is so universal for women.
It didn't start out from a good place either. US in the 70s was still homophobic, racist, and bombed the shit out of middle east. Reminds you of anything?
On this particular front Europe is doing OK as well, but it definitely needs to build more, faster, and now. And to do that it needs to build more ties with China. Honestly looking at the (lack of) EU response over the latest US war crimes I'm not holding my breath here.
I don't know the language at all but I can "read" the script, and they are quite different. The first one is like "Khomenee", the second is like "Khaamenae'i"
Most "western" countries have been acting like this in the past century and are still to this moment reaping the benefits from colonial and imperialist plunder of the global south. It's not just the USA, even though it is the most damaging.
I also dislike Iran's political system, but overall the US has killed, maimed, tortured and ruined the lives of many more people then Iran's government ever could. US is currently the most evil country on this planet, and has been in the running ever since its founding.
But even then, let's suppose for a second that somehow Iran's government is more evil. So what? Bombing Tehran city center, destroying mosques and museums, causing an immense ecological disaster by blowing up oil reservoirs, and double-tapping an all-girls school with tomahawks will not help the people of Iran in any way. It made their lives measurably, verifiably worse for generations.