• 8 Posts
  • 1.26K Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 10th, 2024

help-circle

  • balsoft@lemmy.mltoMicroblog Memes@lemmy.world30 seconds in
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 days ago

    The art is in how the science is applied.

    No, the art is how you express yourself. The theory is just “the way most people in a culture do it because other people in this culture like it”. There is certainly some biological reasoning behind it that is common across cultures, but it’s a fairly small part of music theory. Consider a simple question like “why are dissonant chords considered dissonant?” and it can lead you down a path of discovery.

    It isn’t eurocentric to believe harmonious and rhythmic music sounds better than music that isn’t.

    It absolutely is eurocentric to enforce western music theory as some holy book that separates good music from bad music. It’s a tool that helps you write music that sounds good to a western ear. But a lot of good music can disagree or break the norms of western music theory.





  • Au contraire, a truly “mutualist” society would never fall for the bullshit that is happening.

    If everyone had trust and a good working relationship with their neighbors and solidarity with their working class comrades, the US capitalist class and therefore the government in its current form would quickly cease to exist.

    The problem is specifically that the US capitalists inserted themselves as unavoidable middlemen into every aspect of US life. Notice how you’re not getting food from your community kitchen, you’re getting food from Uber Eats. You’re not usually calling a repairman from your local community, you’re calling a company that sends one out to you. You’re not getting help from your community militia, you’re getting it from an armed wing of the bourgeois government.

    (ironically, this was possible to do through years or “rugged individualism” propaganda, that you are repeating here; other things like car dependency also made things worse)

    This lack of local community is a big part of why there is so little organized protest. It’s very difficult to rile up your neighbors to take up arms and meaningfully protest when you barely even know them. This would apply even more in your imagined scenario of everyone becoming individualists who raise their own cows - people wouldn’t even have time to protest because they would spend all of it on their own survival, and those who stick their head up are easily arrested and thrown into jail, with noone to protect them.








  • balsoft@lemmy.mlto196@lemmy.blahaj.zonerule brian
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    12 days ago

    Nowadays the umbrella is pretty broad, people like Mamdani are often indeed called or identify as socdems, and yet they’re also reformist socialists.

    I just had a brainfart and swapped the words “democratic” and “socialist” around, my bad







  • balsoft@lemmy.mltoMicroblog Memes@lemmy.worldRole models
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    14 days ago

    I do not agree that parental figures don’t matter. There is a bond between parents and children that is simply special - however, parents don’t have to be bio parents. Insert screenshot from the post, where one of kid’s parental figures got filled in by an “outsider”.

    Ok, I think I phrased it the wrong way. I don’t think it’s necessary for a child to have exactly two parents of opposite genders. I think a much healthier way to be brought up is to be parented by a diverse group of people (maybe 5-10), each with their own identities, interests, and skills to learn from.


  • balsoft@lemmy.mltoMicroblog Memes@lemmy.worldRole models
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    14 days ago

    This is just how the societal structure works nowadays due to atomization, the death of extended family and the local community.

    Before all that happened, people actually interacted with their close neighbors (who were also often family members) on the daily, forged relationships and trust with them. It wasn’t a question of “bringing trustworthy adults into a child’s life”, it was actually “bringing a child into an already existing close-knit community”. Common everyday tasks (one of them is looking after children) were often shared between community members so that noone got overwhelmed.

    Of course there are many benefits to modern societal and tech advances too, it’s a fucking miracle that a single mother can raise a child at all, with little or no family support. 200 years ago the child would be dead or sent off to an orphanage.

    I say we should combine the powers of both: bring back the local community to raise children together, and keep the technical progress and societal guardrails we’ve made to make it a lot easier.