My view is picking which is the least dangerous and negatively impacting to the greater good makes a rational argument.
Standing on the sidelines doesn't really do anything except make you feel as though you have a voice.
I've just taken the approach of supporting who's the least insane to keep life livable and making the cases for alternative candidates between.
Most American alternative options are just so fucking quiet between elections that when one comes around they fall into the "wtf is that?" bucket.
Only one that's had a snowballs chance in hell that I remember was Ross Perot in the 90s.
We keep doing what we've always done and expect different outcomes.
What's that called again?