After a point in your career you either learn the skills and get the experience to understand how to plan projects and end up on those groups writing the definitions, or you remain an IC and just code what was given to you.
Problem is too many Mustard Mussolini ball sucking right wing gun fucks out there that would literally kill for a chance to play a mole in any left sided actual constitutional militias.
More like C-Level managers pushing the engineers to use AI in ways nobody wants, including a lot of the engineers, for the sake of propping up a AI bubble to keep driving investment in trash technology.
The problem with most Democrats is they assume anything said or done during the next election will matter.
Seriously, what are angry letters from Schumer going to do when the SCOTUS rules in his favor over ignore several electoral votes cause he claims they're fake?
What's the cabinet going to accomplish when it's all hand picked fuckwads who play his tune like a bad 3rd world regime?
What's the vote of half the house or Senate matter when you need a clear majority to enact an impeachment, and half the country is still good with this all?
Lemmy needs a remindme bot, cause I really want to see how this goes in 3.5 years.
sigh debating it on Lemmy or reddit or wherever isn't going to change their behavior. If you want to argue with them, and you're not quite white enough to avoid getting harassed by them, here is your food for through...
The authority of U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) extends beyond the physical land borders of the United States. A federal regulation establishes a "100-mile zone" where CBP agents have expanded powers to conduct certain enforcement activities. This zone also applies to international airports, which are legally considered the "functional equivalent" of a border.
The 100-Mile Zone and International Airports
It is true that the extended enforcement authority of U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) includes the areas surrounding international airports. This is not a new policy but is based on a long-standing legal concept.
Legal Foundation: The authority is primarily rooted in the Immigration and Nationality Act, Section 287 (8 U.S.C. § 1357). This statute grants federal immigration officers the power to conduct certain enforcement activities without a warrant "within a reasonable distance from any external boundary of the United States."
Defining "Reasonable Distance": The specific distance is defined in the Code of Federal Regulations (8 CFR § 287.1(a)(2)). This regulation officially sets the "reasonable distance" as "within 100 air miles from any external boundary of the United States."
The "Functional Equivalent" Doctrine: While the law mentions "external boundary," courts have consistently held that locations like international airports are the "functional equivalent of the border." This judicial doctrine allows law enforcement to treat these points of entry as if they were the physical border. The U.S. Supreme Court first articulated this concept in the case of Almeida-Sanchez v. United States, 413 U.S. 266 (1973). The court reasoned that a search at a location that is the functional equivalent of a border, such as the point where a person disembarks from an international flight, is legally similar to a search at the actual border.
Within this zone, CBP's authority is broader than that of other law enforcement agencies. The specific activities depend on the context, such as at a fixed checkpoint or during a roving patrol.
At Fixed Immigration Checkpoints
CBP can legally operate checkpoints within the 100-mile zone. At these locations, agents can:
Stop Vehicles: Stop any vehicle to briefly question occupants about their citizenship and immigration status without any suspicion of wrongdoing.
Request Documentation: Ask for documents that prove a legal right to be in the U.S.
Conduct Visual Inspections: Visually inspect the vehicle from the outside.
Refer to Secondary Inspection: Direct any vehicle to a secondary inspection area for further questioning, again without requiring suspicion.
Searches and Property Access
Access to Private Land: A specific provision, 8 U.S.C. § 1357(a)(3), grants CBP agents access to private lands (but not dwellings) without a warrant within 25 miles of the border to patrol for illegal crossings.
Here is some more for you since you appear to want to argue the legal theory on this...
Of course, I am not a practicing lawyer so this isn't law advice. It's links to articles and interpretation.
If you really want to pick a fight, go to Austin, San Antonio, anywhere north of that and south of Michigan... Find an ICE raid, and debate it with them.
After a point in your career you either learn the skills and get the experience to understand how to plan projects and end up on those groups writing the definitions, or you remain an IC and just code what was given to you.