Depends how much campaigning the right has been doing to stir up hatred and dissent. Plenty of reasonable people are down with both of those criteria, but the tories and reform like to make these things scary to the poor gammons
Not really, they dont say that when you go far left enough you wrap around to the right, they say that selfish or malicious people have ruined movements for liberation historically by twisting them
Guess we'll have to agree to disagree - I agree that there are people misusing the words ironic/unironic, I don't think this case is one of them. Have a good one!
Force every move black can make:
Block the pawn's advance with f6->e5, bring your king diagonally up+right toward the fray until the mobile pawn promotes, and capture the resulting piece with your bishop. The only move for black is then to advance the pawn. Move your king to block its advance once more, forcing black to capture your leading pawn. Defend your remaining pawn with your king (Kf5) and black must move their king to the 8th row.
No matter if they choose Kf8, Kg8 or Kh8, capture their remaining pawn and you're effectively at book moves for a king+pawn (+bishop) vs king endgame.
To me, the original post was riddled with "verbal" irony - they were saying things whose words meant one thing but the overall post was actually making fun of the ideas the words were presenting.
My comment serves to state that I agree with the point the words are making and not the meaning through the lens of irony. Ie, unironically.
irony noun [U] (TYPE OF SPEECH)
the use of words that are the opposite of what you mean, as a way of being funny
I respect the pushback though. I have similar gripes with "sarcasm" being used when "irony" is correct and vice versa.
Depends how much campaigning the right has been doing to stir up hatred and dissent. Plenty of reasonable people are down with both of those criteria, but the tories and reform like to make these things scary to the poor gammons