Skip Navigation

Posts
0
Comments
19
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • SpaceX in its short lifetime has had more catastrophic failures more often than the entire history of NASA.

    To build "cheap" prototypes and learn from their failure is their whole business model. And it's working. Their rockets don't fail on missions, they fail while testing.

    SpaceX has done nothing that NASA couldn’t have done had we funded it.

    I disagree. NASA is a government agency and by nature it's held down by bureaucracy and moves at a snail's place. There's no incentive for them to keep to a budget and timeline.

    What NASA is really good at are robotics and observational science. I think they should be funded to put tech in space and on other celestial objects, and the dirty work of getting stuff off the ground should be delegated to private companies.

  • All of that was paid for my tax dollar

    Except it wasn't.

    From wikipedia: "SpaceX developed Falcon 9 with private capital as well, but did have pre-arranged commitments by NASA to purchase several operational flights once specific capabilities were demonstrated."

    NASA payed them to transport cargo to the ISS. Both Falcon1 and Falcon9 were privately funded.

    and costs far more than what NASA would have paid to do it.

    You mean the NASA that's known for budget overruns? That estimated the shuttle program would cost $54M per flight that turned out to cost $409 million? (inflation adjusted)The NASA that couldn't come up with a new launch system for 14 years after the shuttle program was cancelled?

    Do you think SpaceX operates an R&D division of astrophysicists to figure out how space travel even works?

    Do you think astrophysicists is the science of spaceflight? Well, it shows you have no idea what you're talking about.

  • He wants to keep the money despite his rocket programs literally blowing up in everyone’s faces

    What are you yapping about?

    • SpaceX is the most prolific space company in recent history, performing a launch every 3 days on average.
    • Falcon 9 is the most reliable launch system in in world.
    • Besides the 60 year old Soyuz, Dragon is the only human certified spacecraft capable of delivering crews to and from the ISS.
    • Starship is the largest rocket prototype -and manmade object- to leave the atmosphere.

    And they did all this in the last 10 years.

    Shitting on SpaceX just because Elon's name is attached to it, -trendy as it may be right now- is dismissing the work of the engineers who made all this possible.

    And no, I'm not sucking Elon's dick.

    In fact, the only reason SpaceX works well is because, allegedly, there's a wall of people shielding the company from Elon's batshit insanity. If it wasn't for them, he would have ran it to the ground already.

  • "update your drivers and run windows update"

  • Because they're ugly, bulky and inconvenient as fuck.

  • We're in the one where Biff takes the Almanac back to the past.

  • I have a UFO Civic and, out of all the cars I've been in, it has hands down the best dashboard. Everything is tactile and arranged in a way that I don't have to look away from the road to adjust anything.

    Beyond tactile vs. touchscreen, I wish more manufacturers payed attention to ergonomics so I wouldn't have to reach into my ass to find the AC or the defogging button.

  • No, most people just give up after seeing the price.

  • Fun little piece of trivia: Originally, nimrod used to mean "skillful hunter" (after Nimrod, the biblical figure) but then in 1940 Bugs Bunny sarcastically called Elmer Fudd a “poor little nimrod", and kids of the time not knowing the reference, simply assumed it was an insult on Elmer's character.

    And that's how a cartoon rabbit single handedly changed the meaning of a word.

  • We have 3 Stratasys printers at work and yeah, you're absolutely correct.

    To add, their 'professional' slicer program "Insight" is the most user hostile piece of software I've ever laid my eyes on. Straight out of 1992 levels of awful. The workflow, the UI (if you can call it that), everything.

    The other 'user friendly' slicer is "GrabCAD Print", an Apple style piece of garbage. It lacks everything beyond basic functionality, yet lately they've been pumping it full of subscription locked features.

    Honestly, fuck this company.

  • I lived in both. Maybe I have more of an insight than you...

  • That's literally every system.Yes, communism too. Especially communism.

  • I was walking alone in an empty street during NYE when a random girl, who happened to come by, spread her arms and blocked my way in a playful manner.

    She only let me pass once I cracked a smile.It's been well over a decade, but I still remember her face.

    It was the nicest thing anyone has ever done for me.

  • I’ve been eating the same exact thing for years now.

    Ok, is this also an adhd thing, because I've been doing the same and people around me keep commenting on it.

  • You'd probably have to keep tuning as the weight of the spool decreases.Its more practical to print a spool holder with bearings for it. Thingyverse has some good ones

  • That's irrelevant here because what they're describing is happening in every market, not just their niche.

  • There's nothing reasonable about these assumptions.

    There's no way the VisionPro gets even close to 100W. Why? Because heat dissipation. The vast majority of power drawn by semiconductors is dissipated as heat and, in a device that's strapped to someone's face, there's simply no way to dissipate hundreds of watts.

    Also, knowing the battery pack size and battery life, it's easy to guesstimate the power consumption.

    “The Apple Vision Pro provides approximately 2 hours of battery life. Based on its size, the internal battery capacity is estimated to be within 20,000mAh (74Wh), resulting in an overall power consumption of around 30W.”

    Even if we assume the double of that 30W, it's well within USB-C standards.

  • Same. On my tablet I use Brave because it has a tab bar, but I'd rather use FF.