androogee (they/she)

  • 0 Posts
  • 275 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 3rd, 2023

help-circle
  • Just because a set is infinite does not mean that it will contain every possible permutation of something. That’s a common thought but a provably untrue one.

    For example, there are infinite even numbers, and none of them are 3. Not a single one. If someone claimed that generating infinite even numbers would eventually return a 3, you wouldn’t take them seriously, and rightly so.

    But here’s the rub: you can also generate infinite even numbers and never return a 2. Every time you generate an even number, there are infinite numbers that it could be. Even if you don’t allow numbers to repeat, it’s not like you are gonna exhaust the amount of non-2 even numbers.

    Just because a set is infinite does not mean that it will contain every possible permutation of something.

    So back to the typewriters. You might say that while there are infinite numbers, there are not infinite permutations of a string of characters the length of the works of Shakespeare.

    And that’s true.

    If you were to say that a string of characters the length of the works of Shakespeare (or longer) could never be repeated exactly, the yes they would type the works of Shakespeare.

    But then they wouldn’t be typing randomly.

    Randomness repeats. Infinite randomness can repeat infinitely.

    And we are not dealing with strings of characters the length of the works of Shakespeare. We’re dealing with strings of characters of infinite length. And there are, in fact, infinite permutations of those.

    So… Yeah.

    There’s no logical basis for infinite monkeys typing infinitely, inevitably producing the works of Shakespeare. Or fecal dioramas or alternate universes where Spider-Man is real or whatever else. Doesn’t hold water.


















  • androogee (they/she)@midwest.socialtomemes@lemmy.worldSelective rage
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    People made these exact same arguments about the inclusion of a black samurai in an Assassin’s Creed game.

    A black samurai who was based on a real person who actually existed in history.

    The game they’re playing is very obvious to anyone who’s actually paying an ounce of attention, and it has nothing to do with caring about historical accuracy.

    It’s bullshit. It’s an excuse. It’s foolish. I do not suffer it gladly.


  • androogee (they/she)@midwest.socialtomemes@lemmy.worldSelective rage
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    19
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    That’s literally just a longer way of saying that it’s okay if it’s magic but it’s not okay if it’s black people.

    & yeah, I’ll hold my breath for people getting equally upset about white people in fiction. Any day now. I’m sure.

    I can’t disapprove a hypothetical, I guess, but a hypothetical isn’t proof of anything either.


  • androogee (they/she)@midwest.socialtomemes@lemmy.worldSelective rage
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    22
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    No. Fuckin stop it. Its unbearably stupid.

    Historical fiction has existed for a long time.

    Y’all ain’t out here throwing a pouty parade when someone adds technology or magic or monsters into historical fiction.

    But black people? Existing? If that’s where you draw the line, it’s really clear why. Make all the excuses you want.