Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)A
Posts
2
Comments
738
Joined
1 yr. ago

  • No, i'm looking for literally anyone you think is a good representation of your geopolitical perspective that might better inform what you consider "someone who knows what they're talking about".

    You've only shared content of piker responding to twitch chat, which is certainly evocative but not helpful in supporting your claim that 'he doesn't know what he's talking about'. I could certainly share an example of his geopolitical stance that I think is well-supported, but I'm really just trying to gain a better understanding of your worldview beyond the reaction slop you keep pointing to.

  • Which claim? That his dog wears a shock collar? That he used it during a stream? Or that (granting the two previous claims) this stands as evidence that he abuses his dog?

    I'm far more interested in why some people are so eager to litigate a political commentator's relationship with his dog when the bulk of his commentary is pointed at western-backed genocidal apartheid states.

  • I haven't spent a single comment debunking anything in this story.

  • Yes i've seen you post this a couple times. I'm still looking for an example of who you think 'knows what they're talking about'

    So far it just seems like its anyone who shares your perspective, including any old twitch chatter or outspoken genocidal zionist, but you're being a little cagey. Is it willymac? Is that your go-to foreign policy expert? I just want to make sure we're on the same page.

  • incredibly hostile to anyone who does know what they're talking about who disagrees with him

    Hmmm, now who would that be

  • It also doesn't make the conclusion of abuse any less spurious.

  • Yes, your well-documented interest in dogs, and not your woefully underrepresented distaste for a specific type of leftist commentary that piker happens to advocate for.

  • I dont think anyone invested in this actually cares about the specifics of training collars, they're just excited to have a reason to be angry with this person.

  • I don't care

    Yes i think that's pretty emblematic of the situation

    You're parasocially obsessing over a political streamer who has primarily been covering the Palestinian genocide, alongside streamers who have primarily defended it while mercilessly attacking streamers and artists speaking against Israel. Either you don't know you're stepping into two years worth of streamer drama slop, or you're opportunistically jumping on because of your own distaste for his politics.

    Either way, the situation you've dedicated the last three days to on this account is certainly not worth yours or anyone else's time unless you happen to be personally invested in the relative influence of this specific political commentator.

  • Nono, I mean the guy presenting you this evidence in the video. Lonerbox is a genocide denying zionist and has had a two-year-long feud against piker.

    It should be a red flag that all the creators dedicating resources to covering this slop are outspoken zionists.

  • You should know that this guy is a Palestinian genocide denier.

  • Don't get me wrong, that'd be awesome too. But when it's two against 50 like that, it's better to force them to retreat than to escalate when you don't need to.

  • People might be upset that nobody threw any haymakers but its honestly far smarter to do what they did. Physically assaulting those nazis would have gotten a gun drawn (the uniformed one literally reached for his in the first 2 minutes but thought better of it).

    Successfully interfering with the arrest without getting shot or arrested yourself is possibly the best you can expect from these interactions.

  • There are always going to be pockets of the market that aren't completely consolidated under exploitation, but those pockets are usually in places where the COL is much lower than the average income.

    But even in that scenario, local farmers selling produce at a market will still compete against commercialized distributions that push the price lower and limit the market to the privileged bourgeois who have the money to shop for their produce at a market with higher prices and have the labor to spare on themselves and their own needs.

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump
  • I think you scratched a few liberals.

  • Define 'work with' in a way that doesnt involve compromising on genocide.

  • Hmm, can't see anything on my end.

    I'm not really interested in re-litigating this anyway.

  • No, though the headline doesnt help make that clear

    They're talking about strength, not size