Bradley is surprisingly good considering all the "Pentagon Wars" development hell. I think a lot of people still think its junk. When it was more effective than the Abrams in Iraq the theory was that the fighting there mostly didn't require tanks. In Ukraine of course, the fighting was very mechanized in the beginning until equipment losses and drones ended it.

And the Bradley still did very well, better than the MBTs. At this point I think it's reasonable to wonder if MBTs are obsolete, if not all tanks. A lightly-armored vehicle like a Bradley is going to be no more vulnerable against modern MANPATS and drones than a MBT, but it's going to provide just as effective protection against small arms. It's easier to maintain, longer range, and it can do more missions.