• 0 Posts
  • 27 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: July 20th, 2023

help-circle


  • ambitiousslab@lemmy.mltoLinux Phones@lemmy.mlpinephone?
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    29 days ago

    Thanks for explaining some of the history, it makes some sense and gives me some things to try. Thanks for all the work you’ve done on the mobile stack as well. It’s made my life a lot better. And maybe one day I’ll be able to ditch the backup nokia too :)






  • One thing to be aware of is that riding around a lot with the phone attached can cause the stabilisation sensor in the camera to go wrong. When this happens your camera feed starts wobbling around all the time. This happened to a friend of mine and let’s just say his snapchat stories had a very distinctive look :)

    I’m not sure whether more expensive mounts do a better job with this (I think his was quite cheap) but make sure to do your research if you’re planning on using it a lot, and you care about your phone’s camera.


  • ambitiousslab@lemmy.mltoLinux Phones@lemmy.mlpinephone?
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    29 days ago

    If you can afford it, I think the Librem 5 is the best linux-first phone at the moment. Both it and the PinePhone Pro are roughly as fast as each other, but the Librem 5 has a much more premium feel, and the hardware kill switches are much more accessible, if you’re into that kind of thing.

    Back in the day, when the Librem 5 was $1000+, it was a no-brainer for the PinePhone Pro, but I feel it is much more reasonable to recommend the Librem 5 now.

    You can make it work as a daily driver, but I wouldn’t want to depend on it for life and death situations. Calling generally doesn’t work very well - either one side can’t hear the other, or the audio quality is too quiet, or not very good. It’s probably possible to fix if you know what you’re doing, but I don’t know what I’m doing :)

    I carry around a dumbphone and a SIM removal tool, so that I can call someone if I really need to. If you’re happy to do that, I feel it gives you the best of both worlds.

    Otherwise, one alternative is to be an Android-first device, that has good support in PostmarketOS, e.g. the Oneplus 6/6T. Mobile Linux has had such an impact on these devices that the price of these on eBay has gone up in some areas over time :D

    Good luck!







  • ambitiousslab@lemmy.mltoXMPP@slrpnk.netAgainst Silos+Signal
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 month ago

    I’m very sympathetic to this blog post, as it nicely describes why I use XMPP.

    But, on a related note, I have noticed an interesting pattern where people talk past each other a little, especially when conflating user freedom and security.

    If I’m to generalise, I feel the outlook of XMPP users tends to be more systemic and long-term. We’ve seen how chat networks come and go, we’ve seen the dangers of companies promising to serve your interests whilst also being a chokepoint of centralisation. So we tend to de-emphasize papercuts or current issues in clients and the protocol, on the basis that we have the power to fix them if we want to.

    I feel that’s shown in this blog post - all the points come back to the benefits of user freedom: no one entity controls you, the protocol serves you, you can choose your own clients, and if you don’t like it, you can always switch / write your own!

    What I’ve seen is that the people who gravitate towards Signal tend to be more concerned with the here and now - e.g. “how do I get my friend off telegram onto a secure / private service”. I feel in many cases that making arguments about federation and the structure of the network won’t sway them, as they’ll always be able to point to some area where the clients are deficient in the here and now (depending on their interests - papercuts in the clients, different versions of OMEMO being used across the network etc).

    I don’t really have a solution to this, but I think all we can do is continue to make the clients and servers as good as they can possibly be. I always encourage anyone I manage to migrate to XMPP to send me any annoyances they find in the apps, so that they can eventually be fixed. We need to be ready for when Telegram, Signal, WhatsApp etc. abuse their power, because (as we’ve seen from the fediverse) that’s the only time that “regular people” will care for the arguments that we’re making about federation and user freedom.



  • I really wish there was a GPL-licensed rendering engine and browser, accepting community funding, with some momentum behind it.

    I feel Ladybird have correctly identified the problem - that all major browsers and engines (including Firefox) get their primary source of funding from Google, and thus ads. And the donations and attention they’ve received show that there is real demand for an alternative.

    But I think the permissive license they have chosen means history will repeat itself. KHTML being licensed under the LGPL made it easy for Google to co-opt, since it was so much easier to incorporate into a proprietary (or more permissively licensed) codebase.

    There is Netsurf, but the rendering engine understandably and unfortunately lags behind the major ones. I just wish it was possible to gather support and momentum behind it to the same extent that Ladybird has achieved.



  • ambitiousslab@lemmy.mltoPrivacy@lemmy.mlHow I Got a Truly Anonymous Signal Account
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    59
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    How I Got a Truly Anonymous XMPP Account:

    • Open my client (e.g. Conversations, Monal, Dino)
    • Pick a random server, username and password
    • Click register

    Sorry, it’s a cheap joke, but it still baffles me that Signal requires a phone number, so I felt I had to post it :)

    Of course, this is not XMPP-specific either, just my protocol of choice, there are many other open alternatives that also offer such functionality.


  • ambitiousslab@lemmy.mltoPrivacy@lemmy.worldIf Chat Control becomes reality...
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Agreed completely!

    I think there are two main schools of thought - one is to buy linux-first mobile devices, and the other is to make linux work on android devices people already have.

    At the moment, linux on android devices is in a better state. From what I read, calls, battery, suspend etc. generally works well on the OnePlus 6/6T and Pocophone F1.

    For the linux-first approach, I’m very fortunate to have both a PinePhone Pro and Librem 5. They are both improving, and I’ve been daily driving one or the other for a couple of years, but they do still involve some sacrifice. I’m not sure they’re ready for “regular people” yet, but they keep getting better.

    Personally, apart from buying the devices themselves, I prefer to contribute directly to the projects focusing on the software. I feel you can’t go wrong supporting PostmarketOS and Mobian. They are doing heroic jobs and have come a huge way in a few short years. Because they work upstream-first, any benefits one achieves are shared with everyone else in the ecosystem. And any benefits apply just as well to the linux-first phones as to the ones that originally ran android.

    It’s a long mountain to climb, but we’ve seen with Linux on the desktop that, over a period of years, things do get better. You used to have to pick your hardware carefully to get Linux installed. Now, you can install it pretty much anywhere, and most likely everything will work.

    I feel eventually, the hardest problem in getting people to switch will be that proprietary apps won’t work well. I think all we can do is to improve our free software alternatives to the existing ones, especially those with network effects like chat apps, as much as we can.

    Every small step we can take is an important one. It’s easier to get people to switch to Linux if they already use free software, as free software often does a better job targeting Linux than proprietary software does. Meanwhile, it’s easier to get people to switch to free software if they run Linux, as that’s the path of least resistance on that OS.