• 7 Posts
  • 3.32K Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: August 3rd, 2023

help-circle



  • No worries. Yeah, I have been a reluctant adopter of the technology. I honestly didn’t really buy much of the hype until Claude code and some of the better models came along.

    Even frontier models screw up on their first, second, and even third tries at times. The insight that Anthropic really had was realizing that they needed to be allowed to chat with themselves in a loop, fail in a loop, and that they’re much better if you apply objective standards to the projects (things like unit tests of course, but also integration tests, static code analysis, etc).

    The harness is really the thing. Even OpenCode in my experience can produce things that are fairly decent.

    That’s where I think both initial implementations of code helpers (i.e., a vanilla “chat box” with “tools”, and “agentic workflows” that try to one-shot everything) that were made in the initial round of “doing AI” are effectively useless garbage that should be buried like radioactive waste.

    If you don’t prod it, Claude will also spit out worthless crap that doesn’t work at all too. The key is to add all of the plumbing that reasonable projects have (code formatters, linters, etc. etc. forever) and to add gating so that Claude can cycle away getting it wrong and then correcting itself until it gets it right.

    EDIT: More relatedly to this thread, I don’t think I would have any problem with some type of high school elective course where kids could use claude code or something like it to try to write some software. It’s pretty likely that there are some kids already doing so in their free time. I came of age in a similar era for technology in general, and I took three or four electives where I was doing things with computers and it was helpful. About the only argument against it I can think of is a practical one…I don’t think school IT departments are ready for the havoc the kids could potentially unleash with this stuff, and it could be that they do not have the staff necessary to support its usage.



  • I’m not sure why you don’t see the value though.

    I’m not sure why me “seeing the value” or “not seeing the value” has anything to do with this.

    If the market rewards such experience, why should it not be taught?

    Oh ok so now kids need to be taught a curriculum based upon what the stock market says. Sure buddy.

    Is that not the purpose of school? To prepare kids to work?

    That’s actually not the purpose of school, but I’m sure that’s what you think the purpose of school is, and I’m not going to be able to persuade you in this or any other thread that you’re wrong.

    Just go back to hacker news or reddit already with the other “free market” scumbags and leave me alone.

    As for it being “dead simple to use” I guess that means you have no idea how AI works.

    Oh I’m sorry I’m not linked up to AI with a neural netted chip in my brain. I use them by typing words into a chatbot window unlike you, Royal AI wizard. I’m so glad you took the time out of your day to communicate with me, a mere peasant.

    Even people making them, the best in the field, still aren’t using LLMs to the best of their capacity.

    Lol dude these things have already sucked up enough dollars and rivers that they don’t need your tongue bath too.



  • It’s not about “knowing about AI”. I’m sure many kids can and do use it already to cheat. It’s about what you’re teaching kids when they’re in school. What place does it have in grade school learning? I’d argue zero. Apparently, Mamdani agrees.

    Unless you’re campaigning to teach grade schoolers how to train their own language models I don’t see what value teaching kids to use products actually has. It’s fucking dead simple to use. You don’t even have to be able to read.

    You should be able to think critically before using it. And using it doesn’t help you think critically at all, it tries to constantly tell you that you’re the most special little user in the whole world.

    Again, I use it daily. Its use is unnecessary in a grade school classroom. Not everything on earth needs to be part of a grade school curriculum.










  • Wtf does a kid need to learn about AI?

    It’s a fucking chatbot. Even as someone that uses it regularly for work there was very little to learn about it. If you learn how to type from your days as an iPad kid, or how to talk from listening to your parents berate each other, you already know everything necessary to use AI to cheat your way out of ever having to learn anything.

    You’re already in school. Why not try learning a thing or two first to see if you hate it enough to never do it again?