Admin of lemmy.blahaj.zone
I can also be found on the microblog fediverse at @ada@blahaj.zone or on matrix at @ada:chat.blahaj.zone
Admin of lemmy.blahaj.zone
I can also be found on the microblog fediverse at @ada@blahaj.zone or on matrix at @ada:chat.blahaj.zone
ReddThat No Downvoting
ReddThat No Downvoting
ReddThat No Downvoting
For there to be a meaningful criticism to be made against people who don't adopt, adoption would need to be accessible to folk who want kids.
In Australia, queer folk have only been able to adopt since 2017. Even for the straight folk, accessing adoption is next to impossible for most folk. It takes years and lots of money, and it involves the couple (only couples, not singles) being greenlit by the birth parents, which means queer and racial bias is another hurdle.
In theory, you can do international adoption, but that has to be by the books, or the adoption isn't recognised. And and that means dealing with the adoption systems of two countries. It takes time and even more money that adopting locally, and most countries don't allow same sex parents to adopt.
Kids on the streets can't be adopted. The system doesn't work that way.
And kids in the foster system can rarely be adopted. It's sometimes possible, but if adoption is your goal, fostering isn't the way to go about it, because most of the time, adoption won't be possible. Mostly, foster kids get moved around, and returned to their birth families after a period of time. Fostering is laudable, but it's not adoption.
And all of this altogether means that the adoption system is inherently biased towards rich, white straight couples. If that's not you, you're effectively locked out of the system. And on top of that, it doesn't even help the kids in your hypothetical scenario