Because they are in charge.
Because they are in charge.
Couldn’t help myself
What the hell does autism have to do with this?
Failing.
It’s so you can turn the shower on to warm without opening the door. I assume there is a notable splash risk.
That’s a dog that knows how to play the system… You know damn well as you approached their eyes would follow you, but they would not move a muscle.
Clearly a good boy/girl 😁
Hey! Don’t try and palm him off on us.
Just because you took him when South Africa didn’t want him it doesn’t mean we are gonna fall for it!
Edit: Actually, fuck that, send him to Japan. Let Nintendo deal with him for a bit. They are already rich assholes he can’t make them any worse.
You know it’s bad when you look back at Bush’s time in office with a sense of nostalgia…
I’m not saying you are wrong, I’m genuinely curious what makes you think this is AI. Feel like I’ve missed something.
Edit: you know what. Nevermind. I definitely missed something 😄
99% sure the same tactics he uses in America will work in the UK. We aren’t as far off as we’d like to think.
What is that supposed to mean?
You can use DDG anonymously with the Tor Browser.
Yeah, that makes perfect sense. I can understand how something coming across as overly specific could be creepy.
I think I’d put a bit more details to show actual examples then it doesn’t sound hollow. I think I would feel weird if it was just a random short note. Like, what did I do? Did I make a scene? So to avoid making someone else feel that way I’d add a few examples in the least weird way possible 😄
But I’m autistic and tend to question my way of viewing things a lot, so maybe that’s just a me thing 😉
See if you guys know that then why is it still allowed?
Then again I’m from the UK so maybe people in glass houses shouldn’t throw stones…
“Shut the fuck up, Terrance! You don’t know what I need right now!”
I named my helper Terrance.
To be fair, a bad battery would light all those fireworks and camp fuel.
Why?
Seriously, it seems like a genuinely nice note. No harm was done and everything that was said was validating and positive. It didn’t need to be said, but that just makes it all the more special. That guy going out of his way to give that validation when it obviously wasn’t necessary just shows that he isn’t just being a good dad. His parenting is at a quality at that at least one other dad admires. He doesn’t need to be told that, but I’m glad he was.
I suppose I don’t understand your perspective. If you know you’re a good dad then getting validation on top of that is just good, right? If it’s obvious you don’t need it and someone else is still compelled to tell you then you must be doing an even better job than you thought!
It’s good you don’t need validation. In fact it’s a great level of confidence in your ability. So if someone validates that confidence. That’s good? It’s not needed, but it’s still good.
Or at least that was my takeaway, I was curious about yours.
ETA: I had a thought… What would your opinion be if the feedback was negative? What if he was aggressive and mean? Not loud, or drawing attention, just a dickhead to his kids and family.
I’m not looking for any particular answer here, I’m just curious if your opinion would change at all.
Now this is a gender definition I can get behind. None of that string/enum crap, just raw data.