• 4 Posts
  • 67 Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: July 2nd, 2023

help-circle






  • Yeah the house example doesn’t fit well with the numbers listed in the post. 113k -> 400k would mean that the price has roughly doubled twice over 36 years or undergone a 3-4% compounding increase in price per year. That’s still a lot, especially since housing is usually a person’s largest expensive. But the rate of increase isn’t as much as that of college education, where people end up with loans today that rival mortgages of 30 years ago.





  • Yeah, a bunch of historians get together and use a quill pen to write in a big book called “History” and whatever they write is officially what has happened. The historians got together just yesterday and wrote “The USA lost the Iran war.” Now that’s the official history. /s





  • I worked at a gas station about 20 years ago. Even then it would be impossible for someone to give away gas in this way.

    Before the pump turns on, either the customer would have to authorize the transaction with a credit card, or an employee would have to manually authorize the transaction if they were paying with inside the store. If the gas wasn’t paid for, it would be immediately obvious by the end of the day that the till (or books or whatever) was short. To clear out the transaction without paying, we’d have to push some buttons on the register to declare that the customer drove off, and essentially accuse them of stealing, get the manager to check the security cams for the license plates, etc. No one could use that pump until the previous transaction was cleared out.

    Maybe some gas stations worked differently, but I doubt any big chain ones had less security than that.




  • abrake@lemmy.worldtoFuck AI@lemmy.world•Evil Inc
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    I literally said that Meta was firing people for protected leave, disabilities, and medical issues. What I was denying is that they were firing people on the basis of “pre-diagnoses.” All the complaints in the lawsuit are based on diagnoses that employees disclosed to Meta. I think that’s shitty and illegal, but I don’t think there is evidence that Meta is acquiring undisclosed medical information about their employees and using that for layoffs.


  • abrake@lemmy.worldtoFuck AI@lemmy.world•Evil Inc
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    65
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    Alright, if you look at this story from a more reputable source (Reuters), it’s quite a bit different. Meta isn’t accused of using AI with people’s medical information to make early diagnoses and lay them off. Instead,

    According to the complaint, Meta used a number of internal AI-assisted systems to score and rank employees ⁠on a ​termination list. Those included “Metamate,” a large language model assistant; an employee-trained “second ​brain” that tracked workers’ communications and documents; and a productivity score drawn from scanning keystrokes, screen content, emails and browser history, according ​to the lawsuit.

    The 26 plaintiffs, who ⁠filed the lawsuit anonymously, are accusing Meta of violating federal and state laws that ban discrimination or retaliation against workers who have disabilities, take medical leave or are ​pregnant. They also claim that Meta failed to test its AI systems for ​bias in ⁠violation of recently adopted California and New York City laws.

    So it’s still shitty workplace surveillance and discrimination but not the same kind of surveillance and discrimination alleged in the Twitter posts. Meta is using AI to try to rank workers’ productivity (on a bunch of shitty metrics) in a way that may discriminate against people with disabilities or who take medical leave or who are pregnant.


  • abrake@lemmy.worldto196@lemmy.blahaj.zone•prorule
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Speaketh for the self, for this one does not

    I don’t think this is even a good example. “Self” is usually treated as a reflexive pronoun, although I’m not sure if it still counts as one if you say “the self.” And “this” is a demonstrative pronoun. And “one,” as it used in this sentence is an indefinite pronoun.



  • abrake@lemmy.worldtoEurope@lemmy.ml•Womens rights
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    In 2019 Quebec passed a law prohibiting public workers who are in positions of authority from wearing religious symbols. The law violates the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, particularly rights around freedom of religion and expression. But there’s a fancy little mechanism called the “notwithstanding clause” that allows you to pass unconstitutional laws under some circumstances, which Quebec invoked and allowed the law to pass and withstand court challenges.