What makes you think “handle the processing of people as they complete the immigration process” had to include anti-immigration police?

I get the feeling you don’t disagree with the parent commenter at all.

Leverage was/is a pretty ridiculous show sometimes (it’s basically just Ocean’s Five as a series), but I still enjoyed it far more than Dexter

My childhood included my mother owning furniture that was decorative, but that we were not allowed to use.

Some was just because children are messy, but some was because the furniture was just old and couldn’t handle abuse from people sitting too hard or putting stress on unexpected angles.

That’s what this makes me think of

I want my washing machine to notify my phone when a cycle completes… But maybe not quite that much

Maybe I’m misunderstanding how grooming techniques work, but nothing about that chest looks waxed to me at all. It looks drawn on, heavily airbrushed, and it’s all out of proportion.

And the hairy chest looks far more attractive

How many bloods should a healthy man have?

This wasn’t even the first John Redcorn they’ve lost. Seems like there’s been tragedy through the show’s entire run

But the paper said you shouldn’t

Eh, giving out a downvote isn’t a stressor, nor it’s it necessarily personal. It’s not even an indicator that the content should be removed, just that a user doesn’t think it’s helpful/fun/or contributing to the discussion

It’s bare minimum feedback where blocking is not. And honestly, we should encourage more of it, rather than encourage people to create their echo chambers (within an already somewhat echo chambery platform)

If anything is personally stressful, it’s stressing over an anonymous user’s opinion that has very little context to it. Downvotes don’t even hide or reduce visibility of your comments or posts in most of the sorting methods.

This is already a thing that happens currently. Some admins/moderators don’t like being downvoted and ban people for “vote manipulation” because they vote on things in their feed.

It is leading to exactly that, where people are worried that using the voting system as intended will lead to exclusion from participation in some communities.

If you can set up a jury of their peers to convict them, then you’re on the right track.

The main moral argument against it would be lack of due process. While that should involve the courts, morally or ethically it probably doesn’t have to.

Anya could talk to me about anything and I would listen

Anything vaguely circular must be a butthole. Radial symmetry isn’t found anywhere else in nature

I want this food, and I like the way your wife plates it.

Theoretically, you can still sue the office of the President, just not Trump himself.

So, you know. You can cost the taxpayers money, but not the person making the terrible costly decisions

Portal was a Star Trek story after all

Not a typical one. Wheatley proved himself immune to Kirk’s usual method of dealing with rogue computers.

I can’t help but remind you that O’Brien was the one expecting redundant backups in Cardassian systems.

O’Brien was scrappy, but Rom was scrappier. He learned from lack of resources while integrating Ferengi systems with Cardassian systems.

O’Brien had resources to back him up. He may have caused a language epidemic, but Rom never caused a panic unless he was instructed to. And he did that without question

This is terrible advice

Most humans aren’t hunters at all

“People saying I am wrong prove I’m right!”

Can you guess why Jimmy has to live in a slum?

Because Superman is a super-dick?