It's kind of a pain, especially in certain districts in red and purple states where they make it intentionally hard to vote... but for the vast majority of non-voters, either they just don't care or they think it won't make a difference who they vote for.
Is it to complain loudly for years, then vote in a moderate who kowtows to nazis while paying lip service to constituents by pointing to "the bigger evil"?
Or is it to have multiple revolutions that all end up failing and bringing back oligarchy because they can only get rid of the current problem, not keep out the next one?
Violent revolution is a great vehicle for change, but that change is just as easily manipulated by bad actors as well as good.
I think it was a vice president, not a CEO, though really at that level they're all kind of the same.
Edit: upon reflection, I dont think he even shot the guy, the murder robot did.
Edit2EB: upon further reflection I'm probably mistaking it for an earlier scene where the murder bot goes on a rampage, which leads to them making robocop. Clearly I have to rewatch it.
Many years of indoctrination. When Google glass was introduced, it was just 'a neat idea'. Now it's a product, and therefore it's clearly more trustworthy because someone is profiting from it. (/s)
Master, I estimate a 90% chance of you being annoyed by this notification and a 100% chance of me ignoring that statistic.