people argue that their actions brought fascism now to avoid worse fascism later.
See, now that's interesting. There was only one major organized movement around a policy change during the election, and it wasn't about the timing of implementing fascism.
And it lost, as the policy did not change.
Even today the losing party is taking the Whig party strategy of trying to avoid the issue. The Whigs famously failed as a party and ultimately allowed Slavery to spiral as an issue until America Civil Warred over it.
Well first there's the cutting technology. Scything is ancient. Industrial production of push mowers using cylinder blades were developed in the 1800s and the more modern gas powered rotary cutters came along in the 19th century with many other self-propelled and automated mechanisms. This started with coal and wood fired agricultural equipment used for processing, like threshing and winnowing. As internal combustion engines (gas powered) developed in the 20th century more equipment and processes could be incorporated on-site and in-field.
"Should" typically means "must" in the legal sense.
But also consider that getting ICE to leave their agent out to dry would would go a ways in breaking their sense of invulnerability. Same dynamic as getting a police union to dump a cop in the courts.
It does look like the link and post have been 'labeled by moderation' and I don't see it now. The other link posted in this thread with another perspective seems to still work.
I have a coworker that does this and they think it's keeping everything above board but instead they just create openings for opposing councils to second guess and cast doubt on internal processes.
Those kinds of calls are for making determinations and decisions, not airing concerns and greivances for the record.
People's note taking aren't always accurate and they aren't taken under oath. Even when there's nothing even closely illicit being discussed, it's not stenography. Best hope you can defend the veracity of your notes in a deposition or before a judge.
All assuming that's a feature of your job, of course. Otherwise it's probably entirely irrelevant.
Stalemated boondoggles are the point, and Russia is probably the most well equipped to satiate the industry with military surplus and bodies. They don't need to be conventionally arms racing in this economy. No nuclear power really has to.
Ford-Werke in Cologne. They had truck plants in Germany.