Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)Z

ZombiFrancis

@ ZombiFrancis @sh.itjust.works

Posts
0
Comments
1704
Joined
3 yr. ago

  • IIIIIGGGGGGOOOOOOOORRRRRRR!

    Jump

  • Just don't...

    Jump

  • Clearly Obi-Wan is the master of the High Ground. He knows its strengths and weaknesses as second nature enough to exploit as he needed.

    Anakin and Maul had no chance.

    *edit To add: Obi-Wan gets caught in a fight on flat ground in front of Luke? Just gives up.

  • Crackheads versus Palantir Spybox

    Jump

  • A landlord cannot just come on top the lawn and start ripping it up without the tenant's permission.

    On one hand, yes. On the other hand that's only as enforceable as a tenant can fight it.

    In practice it happens. Unless the tenant has the resources or there's a legal advocacy group dedicated to that specific issue, owners tend to be able to do whatever they want so long as they use the argument of 'protecting my property'.

    The settlement and restitution just ends up something like the owner keeps their stuff there and maybe you get to terminate your lease tomorrow without being forced to pay out the whole eight remaining months of the lease. But that's anecdotal.

  • Crackheads versus Palantir Spybox

    Jump

  • Most stores are tenants of a landlord. Even those Walmart warehouses are leased, often both in land and structure.

  • ICE Barbie Confronted by Photo of Her Mile-High Boudoir

    Jump

  • James Talarico Wins Texas Democratic Senate Primary

    Jump

  • That's how you make more flies. The idiom is about catching them, not attracting more.

    More in the honey means less flying around. It's a flytrap.

  • James Talarico wins Democratic primary for US Senate in Texas

    Jump

  • AIPAC money and a Harris endorsement appears to have obliterated an 18 point polling lead. That's crazy to think about.

  • Removed

    Simple and gets the point across

    Jump

  • With sitting members of Congress I always try to acknowledge many of their communications are to, and meant for, other members of Congress, some/many of whom are the most unhinged people imaginable.

  • I didn't join the revolution to read

    Jump

  • I hear you, though I am more inclined to take a Gramscian view that cultural hegemony of capitalist/imperial core entities convert those anarchists to libertarians, or some form of compromised anarcho-syndicalism or libertarian socialism. So I wouldn't call them anarchists.

    But it's not a True Scotsman thing for me, so I don't fundamentally disagree with that perspective.

  • Videogames you always wanted to play but they did disappointed you?

    Jump

  • I feel similarly. I can do the rhythm and timing stuff, but I just kept wanting to do something different each time and there's just no room for that in Sekiro. You play Sekiro's way and that's kind of it.

    That and the grappling hook parkour kept giving me light vertigo.

  • I didn't join the revolution to read

    Jump

  • Anarchists usually don't need the kind of deprogramming of capitalist, monarchist, colonial, or imperial systems that socialist and Marxist theories typically focus on.

  • Trump seems too comfortable with US deaths in his futile Iran war | Opinion

    Jump

  • Oh it can all be found if you look for it, no doubt, but CNNworld has the story down with the monkey with the stuffed animal story.

    APNews does not appear to feature the story on their main page at all. They're running a Today In History story on Rodney King's beating.

    USA Today does have the story on their main page, also fairly low and with the headline: "Who attacked a girls' school in Iran, and will there be accountability?"

    But mainly the pundit circles have been ignoring it. But that's what the punditry circuit does. Hyperfixate, ignore anything as needed.

  • "We need to talk seriously about general strikes, about breaking quorum, about exploiting parliamentary procedure to ensure that Republican legislation doesn't get through." (Kat Abughazaleh)

    Jump

  • but that promise was broken.

    That is ultimately where my criticism falls to. I believe the US and NATO powers cynically never had any intention to back up Ukraine to ths extent being promised. Both then and now.

    Overpromising and underdelivering is a pattern I want broken.

    Like, I want my country to be subject to international law and the ICC. I would love to see many of my elected leaders arrested for war crimes. (And the whole other thing with the pedophilia.)

    Honestly I think dragging Bibi and Trump to the Hague would be one of the strongest actual deterrents of more war around the globe.

  • "We need to talk seriously about general strikes, about breaking quorum, about exploiting parliamentary procedure to ensure that Republican legislation doesn't get through." (Kat Abughazaleh)

    Jump

  • But, if they are in an active war. Wouldn't sending them aid and arms prolong the war? Wouldn't that be pro-war according to how I understand your argument?

    Sending an active war aid and arms is pro-war by using that logic, yes. But that's not the point I was making, which was to armaments as a deterrent strategy. I simply don't think it prevents war, like a deterrent would or should.

    To me the pro-war aspect is not the scale of destruction or costs as it is whether pathways to peace or diplomacy are being closed off, or otherwise escalating military tensions and provocations. The destructive costs are double edged, which is the basis of my view, and why I don't support the more death and destruction rationale to deterrence.

    (For the record, I think we should be sending aid and arms to Ukraine. I'm just trying to follow your logic.)

    And I don't fault that, really. There are different goals in play than preventing war once war starts.

    So like Kat's saying do with Taiwan what wasn't done with Ukraine by committing to a defense of Taiwan maximizing armament and commiting direct intervention. To me that's a pro-war position, albeit one agnostic to whether it pays off or not. (I generally think it doesn't work out long-term.) But not touching the One China Policy, however is where the Kissinger red flags started flying for me.

    (And for the record I think she's going to win and I don't have a problem with that. She'll likely/hopefully be better than who she is replacing. My current rep is a Zionist so if anything I'd take a China hawk like Kat if I could hotswap.)

  • "We need to talk seriously about general strikes, about breaking quorum, about exploiting parliamentary procedure to ensure that Republican legislation doesn't get through." (Kat Abughazaleh)

    Jump

  • Sure, but:

    without touching the political One China Policy outlined in the Shanghai Communiqué

    Coupling that with increasing armaments is what spurred the Kissinger reference. It kinda constrains the trajectory to escalating towards war.

    Which, well, as we are seeing unfold with Iran now and have with the American boondoggles of the 21st century, may not serve Taiwan or the US in the long run.

  • "We need to talk seriously about general strikes, about breaking quorum, about exploiting parliamentary procedure to ensure that Republican legislation doesn't get through." (Kat Abughazaleh)

    Jump

  • Ukraine is an active warzone, so that switch is already flipped.

    As a policy of deterrent though, arming a proxy nation to the teeth I do find to be pro-war.

  • "We need to talk seriously about general strikes, about breaking quorum, about exploiting parliamentary procedure to ensure that Republican legislation doesn't get through." (Kat Abughazaleh)

    Jump

  • I envision a two-part credible deterrence plan that turns Taiwan into a “porcupine” too costly for the PRC to invade, by providing them with weapons to defend themselves and committing to actually defending the island if they do invade.

    It's more the military armament implementation as a pre-emptive and deterrant policy. So perhaps 'pro-MIC including war with China' might've been more technically correct? Or a less globalized M.A.D. policy? Localized?

    Nonetheless she's probably going to be no worse and probably better than the retiring incumbent at any rate, so I can even just chalk it up as an electoral strategy.

  • "We need to talk seriously about general strikes, about breaking quorum, about exploiting parliamentary procedure to ensure that Republican legislation doesn't get through." (Kat Abughazaleh)

    Jump

  • [Deck] Make it make sense

    Jump

  • Turn clockwise = page number go up

    That's how I'd make sense of it.