Calling them "glasses" is such a weasel word. No one cares at all that they are wearing glasses, they are wearing CAMERAS in a place where recording is strictly prohibited.
I sincerely hope that you are going out of your way to troll, and don't actually have thoughts that are this small and poorly formed.
So when someone is dangling the person in the middle will experience the weight of both of the other people, and the person at the other end will experience the entire bodyweight of the person dangling as upwards force on the log that they will have to hold onto. So if the two people on the ends weigh the same, does the the person at the other end get lifted off the ground by the weight of the dangling person; assuming the middle person is strong enough to hold them both up?
I guess what happens practically is that the person in the middle collapses onto the ground and the log gets torn out of the hands of the person at the other end and the dangler goes into the pit?
So I believe that this would work fine when the middle person is being suspended, but I don't think the physics work out when you're dangling someone at the end.
The person at the other end would need to be working their ass off to keep them from falling, the person in the middle would just be a fulcrum basically and wouldn't be able to help much at all as the log spun in their hands.
It would probably work with more than three people. I think it's dicey with three, I think that if they all hold on they would all be going in the hole.
I guess it would also depend on how long the log is. I think it might work with a log longer than the one in the image. I think the one in the image is too short to get sufficient leverage.
No, I said that you should speak to a therapist. You seemed like you are jealous of others and insecure about the impact that you have on the world. Compared to most people on this planet you are almost certainly a wealthy person , or else you wouldn't have the luxury to be wasting your time making these comments in this place.
This is honestly something that you should speak to a therapist about.
You are posting this from a computer or smart phone, a device that costs a significant amount of money. You are wasting your leisure time that you have because of your comfortable wealth and status in society to post to an online platform which doesn't contribute anything to the world. You are richer than most people on the planet. You are wasting the opportunities given to you as a rich person. You could sell your electronic devices and give the money to the poor. You could be volunteering right now helping less fortunate people. Instead you comment on social media that people who are slightly richer than you don't deserve sympathy for their deaths. People who are actually out in the world living their lives exploring the world and enriching themselves.
Is it really right to be judging someone in this way? In the way that I have just judged you?
Cock has always meant rooster as its primary meaning, it's just that back in the day someone thought it would be funny to refer to their penis as a rooster, and here we are, afraid to even use the word to refer to its original meaning..
It is to foil piracy, but in this case, not software piracy, but piracy of your personal data. One drive is a cloud storage platform similar to Dropbox.
I mean good? That's good, he deserved to be charged with that.
Not saying the police officers actions shouldn't be scrutinized, hopefully the body came will be released. I'm not going to judge it too harshly until I watch it.
The person who I know deserves to be charged is the one who broke into someone's home armed with a firearm.
Isn't this an old tweet? Why is there no date on it.