Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)Z
Posts
0
Comments
14
Joined
7 mo. ago

  • Ich verstehe deinen Punkt und teile deine Meinung, dass die Haltung gegen Waffenlieferungen ein dickes Minus für Die Linke ist. Ich denke aber auch, dass wir in Deutschland ein großes Problem bekommen werden, wenn Menschen mit linken Werten nicht anfangen "Kräfte" zu bündeln. Ich habe selbst oft Parteien gewählt die die 5% nicht geschafft haben, weil die mehr mit meinen Ansichten überein stimmten als eine Partei die die 5% erreicht. Das Problem ist, Rechte tun das nicht. Vielen ist es egal ob sie da den Teufel in Person wählen solange er Ihnen verspricht, dass er Ausländer abschiebt.

    Ich teile deine Ansicht, aber ich weiss nicht wie man das Problem anders lösen kann als Kompromisse zu wählen.

  • No it is not. That's only an answer if one thinks that every sources bias is as bad as any other, which was rejected earlier as "outrages strawman". Under the assumption that sources can be more or less biased, it is worth questioning the bias and the statement "there's no such thing as a source with no bias" is a moot point.

  • Sure buddy. It is still irrelevant. It is not hypocritical to ciritice a source. You don't have to prove a different point to bring forward criticism. The only question should be "is the criticism valid?" And not "do you have a better point?"

  • But there is a spectrum. Or are you telling me that every source is as biased as any other?

  • How is it hypocritical? Either the sources are biased or not. The poster not providing proof for a counterargument is irrelevant. Or do you mean they should provide proof for the original sources being biased?

  • It is hard to agree to a statement like "USA doesn't like when their people are attacked or killed" when you consider that they are currently starving their poorest because they are having a budget fight over wether to take away health care for a good chunk of their people or not.

  • Wenn ich mich richtig erinnere ging es darum, dass der Betonblock Hersteller sein Produkt bewarb indem er sagte das System sei so einfach verwendbar wie Lego Steine. Der Markenname wurde also benutzt. Ich habe keine Ahnung von Markenrecht, aber es klingt plausibel, dass Lego da Recht bekommen würde.

  • Hehehe ... Log books

  • I think Russia has shown that just because they couldn't doesn't mean they don't try anyway.

  • ich_iel

    Jump
  • Befestigte es für dich

  • This is not mine and unfortunately I don't remember where I heard it:

    Fascists are the leftist second biggest enemy, with the first place going to leftists that 99% agree with them.

  • Kennst du Esther?

  • Why article 5? Is it not only valid if a country suffers an unprovoked attack? It will be hard to argue that bombing a country is not a provocation.